Difference between revisions of "Helmer-Zinken2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Henrike Helmer; Jörg Zinken; |Title=Das Heißt (“That Means”) for Formulations and Du Meinst (“You Mean”) for Repair? interpret...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Henrike Helmer; Jörg Zinken; | |Author(s)=Henrike Helmer; Jörg Zinken; | ||
| − | |Title=Das | + | |Title='Das heißt' (“that means”) for formulations and 'du meinst' (“you mean”) for repair?: interpretations of prior speakers’ turns in German |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Interpreting; Recognizability | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interpreting; Recognizability | ||
|Key=Helmer-Zinken2019 | |Key=Helmer-Zinken2019 | ||
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |Journal=Research on Language | + | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction |
|Volume=52 | |Volume=52 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=159–176 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2019.1608098 |
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1608098 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2019.1608098 | ||
| − | |Abstract=The recognizability of a stretch of conduct as social action depends on | + | |Abstract=The recognizability of a stretch of conduct as social action depends on details of turn construction as well as the turn’s context. We examine details of turn construction as they enter into actions offering interpretations of prior talk. Such actions either initiate repair or formulate a conclusion from prior talk. We focus on how interpretation markers (das heißt [“that means”] vs. du meinst [“you mean”]) and interpretation formats (phrasal vs. clausal turn completions) each make their invariant contribution to specific interpreting practices. Interpretation marker and turn format go hand in hand, which leads to distinct patterns of interpreting practices: Das heißt+clause is especially apt for formulations, du meinst+phrase for repair. The results suggest that details of turn construction can systematically enter into the constitution of social action. Data are in German with English translation. |
| − | details of turn construction as well as the turn’s context. We examine details | ||
| − | of turn construction as they enter into actions offering interpretations of | ||
| − | prior talk. Such actions either initiate repair or formulate a conclusion from | ||
| − | prior talk. We focus on how interpretation markers (das heißt [“that means”] | ||
| − | vs. du meinst [“you mean”]) and interpretation formats (phrasal vs. clausal | ||
| − | turn completions) each make their invariant contribution to specific | ||
| − | |||
| − | which leads to distinct patterns of interpreting practices: Das heißt+clause is | ||
| − | especially apt for formulations, du meinst+phrase for repair. The results | ||
| − | suggest that details of turn construction can systematically enter into the | ||
| − | constitution of social action. Data are in German with English translation. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:22, 19 January 2020
| Helmer-Zinken2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Helmer-Zinken2019 |
| Author(s) | Henrike Helmer, Jörg Zinken |
| Title | 'Das heißt' (“that means”) for formulations and 'du meinst' (“you mean”) for repair?: interpretations of prior speakers’ turns in German |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Interpreting, Recognizability |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 52 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 159–176 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2019.1608098 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The recognizability of a stretch of conduct as social action depends on details of turn construction as well as the turn’s context. We examine details of turn construction as they enter into actions offering interpretations of prior talk. Such actions either initiate repair or formulate a conclusion from prior talk. We focus on how interpretation markers (das heißt [“that means”] vs. du meinst [“you mean”]) and interpretation formats (phrasal vs. clausal turn completions) each make their invariant contribution to specific interpreting practices. Interpretation marker and turn format go hand in hand, which leads to distinct patterns of interpreting practices: Das heißt+clause is especially apt for formulations, du meinst+phrase for repair. The results suggest that details of turn construction can systematically enter into the constitution of social action. Data are in German with English translation.
Notes
