Difference between revisions of "Peckitt2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Katherine Peckitt; Cordet Smart | |Author(s)=Katherine Peckitt; Cordet Smart | ||
| − | |Title=Conversation | + | |Title=Conversation analysis of psychological formulation discussions in adult learning disabilities teams |
| − | |Editor(s)= | + | |Editor(s)=Cordet Smart; Timothy Auburn |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Clinical conversation; Formulation | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Clinical conversation; Formulation | ||
|Key=Peckitt2019 | |Key=Peckitt2019 | ||
| + | |Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan | ||
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Interprofessional Care and Mental Health | + | |Address=Cham |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Booktitle=Interprofessional Care and Mental Health: A Discursive Exploration of Team Meeting Practices |
| + | |Pages=147–167 | ||
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7 |
|Abstract=This research used CA to analyse the interactional processes between clinical psychologists and their healthcare colleagues, specifically with a focus on psychological formulation discussions. CA identified that formulation discussions did not regularly take place, contrary to clinical psychologist professions’ claims that these discussions happen informally through clinicians ‘chipping in’. However, when formulation discussions occurred, some of the interactions appeared to change the understanding about the service users’ difficulties or gave space for the discussion of delicate topics. | |Abstract=This research used CA to analyse the interactional processes between clinical psychologists and their healthcare colleagues, specifically with a focus on psychological formulation discussions. CA identified that formulation discussions did not regularly take place, contrary to clinical psychologist professions’ claims that these discussions happen informally through clinicians ‘chipping in’. However, when formulation discussions occurred, some of the interactions appeared to change the understanding about the service users’ difficulties or gave space for the discussion of delicate topics. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:46, 17 January 2020
| Peckitt2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Peckitt2019 |
| Author(s) | Katherine Peckitt, Cordet Smart |
| Title | Conversation analysis of psychological formulation discussions in adult learning disabilities teams |
| Editor(s) | Cordet Smart, Timothy Auburn |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Clinical conversation, Formulation |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | Cham |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 147–167 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_7 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Interprofessional Care and Mental Health: A Discursive Exploration of Team Meeting Practices |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This research used CA to analyse the interactional processes between clinical psychologists and their healthcare colleagues, specifically with a focus on psychological formulation discussions. CA identified that formulation discussions did not regularly take place, contrary to clinical psychologist professions’ claims that these discussions happen informally through clinicians ‘chipping in’. However, when formulation discussions occurred, some of the interactions appeared to change the understanding about the service users’ difficulties or gave space for the discussion of delicate topics.
Notes
