Difference between revisions of "Suchman-etal2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lucy Suchman; Dominik Gerst; Hannes Krämer; |Title="If You Want to Understand the Big Issues, You Need to Understand the Everyday Pract...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Lucy Suchman; Dominik Gerst; Hannes Krämer; | |Author(s)=Lucy Suchman; Dominik Gerst; Hannes Krämer; | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=”If you want to understand the big issues, you need to understand the everyday practices that constitute them” |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; ethnomethodology; Garfinkel; human-machine interaction; science and technology studies; feminism; mundane practices; mutual intelligibility; documentary method; intervening social science | |Tag(s)=EMCA; ethnomethodology; Garfinkel; human-machine interaction; science and technology studies; feminism; mundane practices; mutual intelligibility; documentary method; intervening social science | ||
|Key=Suchman-etal2019 | |Key=Suchman-etal2019 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=Art. 1 | |Pages=Art. 1 | ||
| − | |URL=http:// | + | |URL=http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3252 |
|DOI=10.17169/fqs-20.2.3252 | |DOI=10.17169/fqs-20.2.3252 | ||
| − | |Abstract=With her book "Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine | + | |Abstract=With her book "Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication," Lucy SUCHMAN (1987) not only opened up a whole new domain of scientific interest but also showed how the scope of ethnomethodological inquiry can be widened in a fruitful way. Since then she is best known for her extensive contributions to the field of science and technology studies. In this interview, SUCHMAN gives insights into how she brought ethnomethodological sensibilities to new research fields, including human-machine interaction and feminist scholarship. She shares personal anecdotes of her meetings with Harold GARFINKEL and reflects upon key ethnomethodological elements such as the analysis of mundane practices and the fundamental sociality of mutual intelligibility. Discussing the relevance for material studies and how ethnomethodology can contribute to a politically engaged social science, SUCHMAN strikingly demonstrates the actuality of ethnomethodology's program. |
| − | Communication," Lucy SUCHMAN (1987) not only opened up a whole new domain of scientific | ||
| − | interest but also showed how the scope of ethnomethodological inquiry can be widened in a fruitful | ||
| − | way. Since then she is best known for her extensive contributions to the field of science and | ||
| − | technology studies. In this interview, SUCHMAN gives insights into how she brought | ||
| − | ethnomethodological sensibilities to new research fields, including human-machine interaction and | ||
| − | feminist scholarship. She shares personal anecdotes of her meetings with Harold GARFINKEL and | ||
| − | reflects upon key ethnomethodological elements such as the analysis of mundane practices and | ||
| − | the fundamental sociality of mutual intelligibility. Discussing the relevance for material studies and | ||
| − | how ethnomethodology can contribute to a politically engaged social science, SUCHMAN strikingly | ||
| − | demonstrates the actuality of ethnomethodology's program. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:14, 16 January 2020
| Suchman-etal2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Suchman-etal2019 |
| Author(s) | Lucy Suchman, Dominik Gerst, Hannes Krämer |
| Title | ”If you want to understand the big issues, you need to understand the everyday practices that constitute them” |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, ethnomethodology, Garfinkel, human-machine interaction, science and technology studies, feminism, mundane practices, mutual intelligibility, documentary method, intervening social science |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | Art. 1 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.17169/fqs-20.2.3252 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
With her book "Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication," Lucy SUCHMAN (1987) not only opened up a whole new domain of scientific interest but also showed how the scope of ethnomethodological inquiry can be widened in a fruitful way. Since then she is best known for her extensive contributions to the field of science and technology studies. In this interview, SUCHMAN gives insights into how she brought ethnomethodological sensibilities to new research fields, including human-machine interaction and feminist scholarship. She shares personal anecdotes of her meetings with Harold GARFINKEL and reflects upon key ethnomethodological elements such as the analysis of mundane practices and the fundamental sociality of mutual intelligibility. Discussing the relevance for material studies and how ethnomethodology can contribute to a politically engaged social science, SUCHMAN strikingly demonstrates the actuality of ethnomethodology's program.
Notes
