Difference between revisions of "Albert2018"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-05-18 08:21:31) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Saul Albert; Charlotte Albury; Marc Alexander; Matthew Tobias Harris; Emily Hofstetter; Edward J. B. Holmes; Elizabeth Stokoe; | ||
| + | |Title=The conversational rollercoaster: Conversation analysis and the public science of talk | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; New Scientist Live; conversational rollercoaster; data session; applied conversation analysis; transcription; conversation analysis; Ethnomethodology; public engagement; science exhibits; talkaoke | ||
|Key=Albert2018 | |Key=Albert2018 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=397–424 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445618754571 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445618754571 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445618754571 | ||
|Abstract=How does talk work, and can we engage the public in a dialogue about the scientific study of talk? This article presents a history, critical evaluation and empirical illustration of the public science of talk. We chart the public ethos of conversation analysis that treats talk as an inherently public phenomenon and its transcribed recordings as public data. We examine the inherent contradictions that conversation analysis is simultaneously obscure yet highly cited; it studies an object that people understand intuitively, yet routinely produces counter-intuitive findings about talk. We describe a novel methodology for engaging the public in a science exhibition event and show how our ‘conversational rollercoaster’ used live recording, transcription and public-led analysis to address the challenge of demonstrating how talk can become an informative object of scientific research. We conclude by encouraging researchers not only to engage in a public dialogue but also to find ways to actively engage people in taking a scientific approach to talk as a pervasive, structural feature of their everyday lives. | |Abstract=How does talk work, and can we engage the public in a dialogue about the scientific study of talk? This article presents a history, critical evaluation and empirical illustration of the public science of talk. We chart the public ethos of conversation analysis that treats talk as an inherently public phenomenon and its transcribed recordings as public data. We examine the inherent contradictions that conversation analysis is simultaneously obscure yet highly cited; it studies an object that people understand intuitively, yet routinely produces counter-intuitive findings about talk. We describe a novel methodology for engaging the public in a science exhibition event and show how our ‘conversational rollercoaster’ used live recording, transcription and public-led analysis to address the challenge of demonstrating how talk can become an informative object of scientific research. We conclude by encouraging researchers not only to engage in a public dialogue but also to find ways to actively engage people in taking a scientific approach to talk as a pervasive, structural feature of their everyday lives. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 14 January 2020
| Albert2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Albert2018 |
| Author(s) | Saul Albert, Charlotte Albury, Marc Alexander, Matthew Tobias Harris, Emily Hofstetter, Edward J. B. Holmes, Elizabeth Stokoe |
| Title | The conversational rollercoaster: Conversation analysis and the public science of talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, New Scientist Live, conversational rollercoaster, data session, applied conversation analysis, transcription, conversation analysis, Ethnomethodology, public engagement, science exhibits, talkaoke |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 397–424 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445618754571 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
How does talk work, and can we engage the public in a dialogue about the scientific study of talk? This article presents a history, critical evaluation and empirical illustration of the public science of talk. We chart the public ethos of conversation analysis that treats talk as an inherently public phenomenon and its transcribed recordings as public data. We examine the inherent contradictions that conversation analysis is simultaneously obscure yet highly cited; it studies an object that people understand intuitively, yet routinely produces counter-intuitive findings about talk. We describe a novel methodology for engaging the public in a science exhibition event and show how our ‘conversational rollercoaster’ used live recording, transcription and public-led analysis to address the challenge of demonstrating how talk can become an informative object of scientific research. We conclude by encouraging researchers not only to engage in a public dialogue but also to find ways to actively engage people in taking a scientific approach to talk as a pervasive, structural feature of their everyday lives.
Notes
