Difference between revisions of "Albert-deRuiter2018"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Saul Albert; J. P. de Ruiter |Title=Repair: The Interface Between Interaction and Cognition |Tag(s)=EMCA; Repair; Cognition; Methodology...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Saul Albert; | + | |Author(s)=Saul Albert; Jan P. de Ruiter |
| − | |Title=Repair: | + | |Title=Repair: the interface between interaction and cognition |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Repair; Cognition; Methodology; Ethnomethodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Repair; Cognition; Methodology; Ethnomethodology; |
|Key=Albert-deRuiter2018 | |Key=Albert-deRuiter2018 | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Topics in Cognitive Science | |Journal=Topics in Cognitive Science | ||
|Volume=10 | |Volume=10 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| − | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ | + | |Pages=279–313 |
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tops.12339 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/tops.12339 | |DOI=10.1111/tops.12339 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Conversational repair is the process people use to detect and resolve problems of speaking, | + | |Abstract=Conversational repair is the process people use to detect and resolve problems of speaking, hearing, and understanding. Through repair, participants in social interaction display how they establish and maintain communication and mutual understanding. We argue that repair provides a crucial theoretical interface for research between diverse approaches to studying human interaction. We provide an overview of conversation analytic findings about repair in order to encourage further cross‐disciplinary research involving both detailed inductive inquiry and more theory‐driven experimental approaches. We outline CA's main typologies of repair and its methodological rationale, and we provide transcripts and examples that readers can explore for themselves using open data from online corpora. Since participants in interaction use repair to deal with problems as they emerge at the surface level of talk, we conclude that repair can be a point of convergence for studying mis/communication from multiple methodological perspectives. |
| − | hearing, and understanding. Through repair, participants in social interaction display how they | ||
| − | establish and maintain communication and mutual understanding. We argue that repair provides a | ||
| − | crucial theoretical interface for research between diverse approaches to studying human interaction. | ||
| − | We provide an overview of conversation analytic findings about repair in order to encourage | ||
| − | further | ||
| − | experimental approaches. We outline | ||
| − | rationale, and we provide transcripts and examples that readers can explore for themselves using | ||
| − | open data from online corpora. Since participants in interaction use repair to deal with problems | ||
| − | as they emerge at the surface level of talk, we conclude that repair can be a point of convergence | ||
| − | for studying mis/communication from multiple methodological perspectives. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 14 January 2020
| Albert-deRuiter2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Albert-deRuiter2018 |
| Author(s) | Saul Albert, Jan P. de Ruiter |
| Title | Repair: the interface between interaction and cognition |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Repair, Cognition, Methodology, Ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Topics in Cognitive Science |
| Volume | 10 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 279–313 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/tops.12339 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Conversational repair is the process people use to detect and resolve problems of speaking, hearing, and understanding. Through repair, participants in social interaction display how they establish and maintain communication and mutual understanding. We argue that repair provides a crucial theoretical interface for research between diverse approaches to studying human interaction. We provide an overview of conversation analytic findings about repair in order to encourage further cross‐disciplinary research involving both detailed inductive inquiry and more theory‐driven experimental approaches. We outline CA's main typologies of repair and its methodological rationale, and we provide transcripts and examples that readers can explore for themselves using open data from online corpora. Since participants in interaction use repair to deal with problems as they emerge at the surface level of talk, we conclude that repair can be a point of convergence for studying mis/communication from multiple methodological perspectives.
Notes
