Difference between revisions of "Brown-etal2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Barry Brown; Kenton O'hara; Moira Mcgregor; Donal Mcmillan |Title=Text in Talk: Lightweight Messages in Co-Present Interaction |Tag(s)=E...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Barry Brown; Kenton O'hara; Moira Mcgregor; Donal Mcmillan
 
|Author(s)=Barry Brown; Kenton O'hara; Moira Mcgregor; Donal Mcmillan
|Title=Text in Talk: Lightweight Messages in Co-Present Interaction
+
|Title=Text in talk: lightweight messages in co-present interaction
|Tag(s)=EMCA; HCI; Text messaging; Technologized interaction;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; HCI; Text messaging; Technologized interaction;
 
|Key=Brown-etal2018
 
|Key=Brown-etal2018
 
|Year=2018
 
|Year=2018
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=24
 
|Volume=24
 
|Number=6
 
|Number=6
 +
|Pages=Article 42
 
|URL=https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3152419
 
|URL=https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3152419
 
|DOI=10.1145/3152419
 
|DOI=10.1145/3152419
 
|Abstract=While lightweight text messaging applications have been researched extensively, new messaging applications such as iMessage, WhatsApp, and Snapchat offer some new functionality and potential uses. Moreover, the role messaging plays in interaction and talk with those who are co-present has been neglected. In this article, we draw upon a corpus of naturalistic recordings of text message reading and composition to document the face-to-face life of text messages. Messages, both sent and received, share similarities with reported speech in conversation; they can become topical resource for local conversation–supporting verbatim reading aloud or adaptive summaries. Yet with text messages, their verifiability creates a distinctive resource. Similarly, in message composition, what to write may be discussed with collocated others. We conclude with discussion of designs for messaging in both face-to-face, and remote, communication.
 
|Abstract=While lightweight text messaging applications have been researched extensively, new messaging applications such as iMessage, WhatsApp, and Snapchat offer some new functionality and potential uses. Moreover, the role messaging plays in interaction and talk with those who are co-present has been neglected. In this article, we draw upon a corpus of naturalistic recordings of text message reading and composition to document the face-to-face life of text messages. Messages, both sent and received, share similarities with reported speech in conversation; they can become topical resource for local conversation–supporting verbatim reading aloud or adaptive summaries. Yet with text messages, their verifiability creates a distinctive resource. Similarly, in message composition, what to write may be discussed with collocated others. We conclude with discussion of designs for messaging in both face-to-face, and remote, communication.
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 01:43, 14 January 2020

Brown-etal2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Brown-etal2018
Author(s) Barry Brown, Kenton O'hara, Moira Mcgregor, Donal Mcmillan
Title Text in talk: lightweight messages in co-present interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, HCI, Text messaging, Technologized interaction
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Volume 24
Number 6
Pages Article 42
URL Link
DOI 10.1145/3152419
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

While lightweight text messaging applications have been researched extensively, new messaging applications such as iMessage, WhatsApp, and Snapchat offer some new functionality and potential uses. Moreover, the role messaging plays in interaction and talk with those who are co-present has been neglected. In this article, we draw upon a corpus of naturalistic recordings of text message reading and composition to document the face-to-face life of text messages. Messages, both sent and received, share similarities with reported speech in conversation; they can become topical resource for local conversation–supporting verbatim reading aloud or adaptive summaries. Yet with text messages, their verifiability creates a distinctive resource. Similarly, in message composition, what to write may be discussed with collocated others. We conclude with discussion of designs for messaging in both face-to-face, and remote, communication.

Notes