Difference between revisions of "Speer-McPhillips2018"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Susan A. Speer; Rebecca McPhillips |Title=Initiating discussions about weight in a non-weight-specific setting: What can we learn about...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Susan A. Speer; Rebecca McPhillips | |Author(s)=Susan A. Speer; Rebecca McPhillips | ||
|Title=Initiating discussions about weight in a non-weight-specific setting: What can we learn about the interactional consequences of different communication practices from an examination of clinical consultations? | |Title=Initiating discussions about weight in a non-weight-specific setting: What can we learn about the interactional consequences of different communication practices from an examination of clinical consultations? | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Clinical communication; Weight; Obesity | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Clinical communication; Weight; Obesity |
|Key=Speer-McPhillips2018 | |Key=Speer-McPhillips2018 | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=British Journal of Health Psychology | |Journal=British Journal of Health Psychology | ||
| + | |Volume=23 | ||
| + | |Number=4 | ||
| + | |Pages=888–907 | ||
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjhp.12322 | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjhp.12322 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1111/bjhp.12322 |
| − | |Abstract=Objectives. Effective clinical communication is fundamental to tackling overweight and | + | |Abstract=Objectives. Effective clinical communication is fundamental to tackling overweight and obesity. However, little is known about how weight is discussed in non-weight-specific settings where the primary purpose of the interaction concerns clinical matters apparently unrelated to weight. This study explores how mental health clinicians initiate discussions about a patient’s possible weight problem in the non-weight-specific setting of a UK NHS Gender Identity Clinic (GIC), where weight is topicalized during discussions about the risks of treatment. |
| − | obesity. However, little is known about how weight is discussed in non-weight-specific | + | |
| − | settings where the primary purpose of the interaction concerns clinical matters | ||
| − | apparently unrelated to weight. This study explores how mental health clinicians initiate | ||
| − | discussions about a patient’s possible weight problem in the non-weight-specific setting of | ||
| − | a UK NHS Gender Identity Clinic (GIC), where weight is topicalized during discussions | ||
| − | about the risks of treatment. | ||
Design. A conversation analytic study. | Design. A conversation analytic study. | ||
| − | Methods. A total of 194 recordings of routine clinician–patient consultations were | + | |
| − | collected from the GIC. Weight talk was initiated by four clinicians in 43 consultations. | + | Methods. A total of 194 recordings of routine clinician–patient consultations were collected from the GIC. Weight talk was initiated by four clinicians in 43 consultations. Twenty-one instances contained reference to a possible weight problem. Transcripts were analysed using conversation analysis. |
| − | Twenty-one instances contained reference to a possible weight problem. Transcripts | + | |
| − | were analysed using conversation analysis. | + | Results. Clinicians used three communication practices to initiate discussion of a possible weight problem with patients: (1) announcing that patients are overweight; (2) asking patients whether they are overweight; and (3) deducing that patients are overweight or obese via a body mass index (BMI) calculation. Announcing that patients are overweight is the least aligning practice that denies patient’s agency and grammatically constrains them to agree with a negative label. Asking patients whether they are overweight treats them as having limited agency and generates comparatively aligning, but occasionally resistant, responses. Jointly deducing that patients are overweight or obese via a BMI calculation is the most aligning practice, which deflects responsibility for labelling the patient onto an objective instrument. |
| − | Results. Clinicians used three communication practices to initiate discussion of a possible | + | |
| − | weight problem with patients: (1) announcing that patients are overweight; (2) asking | + | Conclusions. Small differences in the wording of turns that initiate discussions about a possible weight problem can have significant consequences for interactional alignment. Clinicians from different specialities may benefit from considering the interactional consequences of different practices for initiating discussions about weight during the kinds of real-life discussions considered here. |
| − | patients whether they are overweight; and (3) deducing that patients are overweight or | ||
| − | obese via a body mass index (BMI) calculation. Announcing that patients are overweight is the | ||
| − | least aligning practice that denies patient’s agency and grammatically constrains them to | ||
| − | agree with a negative label. Asking patients whether they are overweight treats them as | ||
| − | having limited agency and generates comparatively aligning, but occasionally resistant, | ||
| − | responses. Jointly deducing that patients are overweight or obese via a BMI calculation is the | ||
| − | most aligning practice, which deflects responsibility for labelling the patient onto an | ||
| − | objective instrument. | ||
| − | Conclusions. Small differences in the wording of turns that initiate discussions about a | ||
| − | possible weight problem can have significant consequences for interactional alignment. | ||
| − | Clinicians from different specialities may benefit from considering the interactional | ||
| − | consequences of different practices for initiating discussions about weight during the | ||
| − | kinds of real-life discussions considered here. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:48, 12 January 2020
| Speer-McPhillips2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Speer-McPhillips2018 |
| Author(s) | Susan A. Speer, Rebecca McPhillips |
| Title | Initiating discussions about weight in a non-weight-specific setting: What can we learn about the interactional consequences of different communication practices from an examination of clinical consultations? |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Clinical communication, Weight, Obesity |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | British Journal of Health Psychology |
| Volume | 23 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 888–907 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjhp.12322 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Objectives. Effective clinical communication is fundamental to tackling overweight and obesity. However, little is known about how weight is discussed in non-weight-specific settings where the primary purpose of the interaction concerns clinical matters apparently unrelated to weight. This study explores how mental health clinicians initiate discussions about a patient’s possible weight problem in the non-weight-specific setting of a UK NHS Gender Identity Clinic (GIC), where weight is topicalized during discussions about the risks of treatment.
Design. A conversation analytic study.
Methods. A total of 194 recordings of routine clinician–patient consultations were collected from the GIC. Weight talk was initiated by four clinicians in 43 consultations. Twenty-one instances contained reference to a possible weight problem. Transcripts were analysed using conversation analysis.
Results. Clinicians used three communication practices to initiate discussion of a possible weight problem with patients: (1) announcing that patients are overweight; (2) asking patients whether they are overweight; and (3) deducing that patients are overweight or obese via a body mass index (BMI) calculation. Announcing that patients are overweight is the least aligning practice that denies patient’s agency and grammatically constrains them to agree with a negative label. Asking patients whether they are overweight treats them as having limited agency and generates comparatively aligning, but occasionally resistant, responses. Jointly deducing that patients are overweight or obese via a BMI calculation is the most aligning practice, which deflects responsibility for labelling the patient onto an objective instrument.
Conclusions. Small differences in the wording of turns that initiate discussions about a possible weight problem can have significant consequences for interactional alignment. Clinicians from different specialities may benefit from considering the interactional consequences of different practices for initiating discussions about weight during the kinds of real-life discussions considered here.
Notes
