Difference between revisions of "DeStefani-etal2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elwys De Stefani; Paul Sambre; Dorien Van De Mieroop; |Title=The interactional history of examples and parentheses: Note-taking practice...")
 
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|Key=DeStefani-etal2016
 
|Key=DeStefani-etal2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Language and Dialogue
 
|Journal=Language and Dialogue
 
|Volume=6
 
|Volume=6
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
 
|Pages=110–139
 
|Pages=110–139
 +
|URL=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.6.1.04des
 
|DOI=10.1075/ld.6.1.04des
 
|DOI=10.1075/ld.6.1.04des
|Abstract=In this article, we set out to examine how participants organize their note-taking  
+
|Abstract=In this article, we set out to examine how participants organize their note-taking while engaged in multiparty interaction. We first describe the collective display of affiliation as an interactional practice that allows note-takers to identify recordables and to legitimize their writing. We then focus on the use of examples (e.g.) and parentheses in the written notes. While style guides recommend the use of examples and parentheses to indicate subsidiary information, we describe the interactional history that leads to such scriptorial practices in collaborative writing. The analyses show that both examples and parentheses may originate from various interactional practices (e.g. listing, instruction, epistemic disputes) and that they may relate to highly salient topics of the interaction. We use the methods developed in conversation analysis, which we extend to the analysis of multimodal phenomena of interaction.
while engaged in multiparty interaction. We frst describe the collective dis-
 
play of afliation as an interactional practice that allows note-takers to identify  
 
recordables and to legitimize their writing. We then focus on the use of examples  
 
(e.g.) and parentheses in the written notes. While style guides recommend the  
 
use of examples and parentheses to indicate subsidiary information, we describe  
 
the interactional history that leads to such scriptorial practices in collaborative  
 
writing. Te analyses show that both examples and parentheses may originate  
 
from various interactional practices (e.g. listing, instruction, epistemic disputes)  
 
and that they may relate to highly salient topics of the interaction. We use the  
 
methods developed in conversation analysis, which we extend to the analysis of  
 
multimodal phenomena of interaction.
 
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:48, 27 December 2019

DeStefani-etal2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key DeStefani-etal2016
Author(s) Elwys De Stefani, Paul Sambre, Dorien Van De Mieroop
Title The interactional history of examples and parentheses: Note-taking practices in multiparty interaction among attendees of a mutual-help group for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) suferers
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, note-taking, examples, parentheses, afliation, multiparty
Publisher
Year 2016
Language English
City
Month
Journal Language and Dialogue
Volume 6
Number 1
Pages 110–139
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/ld.6.1.04des
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this article, we set out to examine how participants organize their note-taking while engaged in multiparty interaction. We first describe the collective display of affiliation as an interactional practice that allows note-takers to identify recordables and to legitimize their writing. We then focus on the use of examples (e.g.) and parentheses in the written notes. While style guides recommend the use of examples and parentheses to indicate subsidiary information, we describe the interactional history that leads to such scriptorial practices in collaborative writing. The analyses show that both examples and parentheses may originate from various interactional practices (e.g. listing, instruction, epistemic disputes) and that they may relate to highly salient topics of the interaction. We use the methods developed in conversation analysis, which we extend to the analysis of multimodal phenomena of interaction.

Notes