Difference between revisions of "Mihas2016"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elena Mihas |Title=Language-specific resources in talk: A study of epistemic stance coding in Alto Perené (Arawak) agreements |Tag(s)=E...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Mihas2016 | |Key=Mihas2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=18 | |Volume=18 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=165–187 | |Pages=165–187 | ||
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445615623905 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1461445615623905 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445615623905 | ||
|Abstract=Based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork in lowland Peru, this study examines linguistic resources used for coding agreements in Alto Perené (Arawak) conversation. The study draws on the anthropological tradition of conversation analysis-informed ethnographies. The investigation of agreeing responses is limited to those which allow a projectedly ‘knowing’, or K-plus, participant to raise his or her epistemic status from the sequentially second position. It is shown that Alto Perené K-plus response formats include the evaluative property word kametsari ‘good’ with an intensifier and/or upgraded prosody, argument focus structures, two polarity verbs ari ‘it is the case’ and omapero ‘it is true’, and the verb ñakiro ‘as you can see’. This analysis demonstrates a relationship between the Alto Perené practices of expressing K-plus agreements and the collateral effects arising from the particular meanings and functions of structures which are used for accomplishing an agreeing action. | |Abstract=Based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork in lowland Peru, this study examines linguistic resources used for coding agreements in Alto Perené (Arawak) conversation. The study draws on the anthropological tradition of conversation analysis-informed ethnographies. The investigation of agreeing responses is limited to those which allow a projectedly ‘knowing’, or K-plus, participant to raise his or her epistemic status from the sequentially second position. It is shown that Alto Perené K-plus response formats include the evaluative property word kametsari ‘good’ with an intensifier and/or upgraded prosody, argument focus structures, two polarity verbs ari ‘it is the case’ and omapero ‘it is true’, and the verb ñakiro ‘as you can see’. This analysis demonstrates a relationship between the Alto Perené practices of expressing K-plus agreements and the collateral effects arising from the particular meanings and functions of structures which are used for accomplishing an agreeing action. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:08, 25 December 2019
| Mihas2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Mihas2016 |
| Author(s) | Elena Mihas |
| Title | Language-specific resources in talk: A study of epistemic stance coding in Alto Perené (Arawak) agreements |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Alto Perené Arawak, assessments, conversation, epistemic stance, K-plus agreement |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 165–187 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445615623905 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork in lowland Peru, this study examines linguistic resources used for coding agreements in Alto Perené (Arawak) conversation. The study draws on the anthropological tradition of conversation analysis-informed ethnographies. The investigation of agreeing responses is limited to those which allow a projectedly ‘knowing’, or K-plus, participant to raise his or her epistemic status from the sequentially second position. It is shown that Alto Perené K-plus response formats include the evaluative property word kametsari ‘good’ with an intensifier and/or upgraded prosody, argument focus structures, two polarity verbs ari ‘it is the case’ and omapero ‘it is true’, and the verb ñakiro ‘as you can see’. This analysis demonstrates a relationship between the Alto Perené practices of expressing K-plus agreements and the collateral effects arising from the particular meanings and functions of structures which are used for accomplishing an agreeing action.
Notes
