Difference between revisions of "Patrika2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Pinelopi Patrika; Eleftheria Tseliou |Title=Blame, responsibility and systemic neutrality: a discourse analysis methodology to the study...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Patrika-Tseliou2015 to Patrika2016 without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Pinelopi Patrika; Eleftheria Tseliou | |Author(s)=Pinelopi Patrika; Eleftheria Tseliou | ||
|Title=Blame, responsibility and systemic neutrality: a discourse analysis methodology to the study of family therapy problem talk | |Title=Blame, responsibility and systemic neutrality: a discourse analysis methodology to the study of family therapy problem talk | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=Family Therapy; Accountability; Discursive Psychology; EMCA; Troubles; | + | |Tag(s)=Family Therapy; Accountability; Discursive Psychology; EMCA; Troubles; |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Patrika2016 |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2016 |
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Family Therapy | |Journal=Journal of Family Therapy | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |Volume=38 |
| − | |DOI= | + | |Number=4 |
| − | + | |Pages=467–490 | |
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-6427.12076 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1111/1467-6427.12076 | ||
|Abstract=In this article we present discourse analysis of initial systemic family therapy sessions, focusing on family members' responses to therapists' attempts to introduce a systemically neutral, relational perspective on their troubles, by means of circular questioning and the final team message. The article draws from a qualitative study of family therapy problem talk with a sample of nine videotaped first and second sessions with six families and four therapists. The sessions were transcribed verbatim and subjected to discourse analysis following the discursive action model. Our analysis indicates that family members may decode the therapists' discursive moves as attributing blame or responsibility to them and engage in further blaming of the identified patient. We conclude by raising the implications of the present research study for the latent attributional work in clinical practice. We also stress the potential of discourse analysis methodology for studying blaming actions and for enhancing reflexivity about our models and practices. | |Abstract=In this article we present discourse analysis of initial systemic family therapy sessions, focusing on family members' responses to therapists' attempts to introduce a systemically neutral, relational perspective on their troubles, by means of circular questioning and the final team message. The article draws from a qualitative study of family therapy problem talk with a sample of nine videotaped first and second sessions with six families and four therapists. The sessions were transcribed verbatim and subjected to discourse analysis following the discursive action model. Our analysis indicates that family members may decode the therapists' discursive moves as attributing blame or responsibility to them and engage in further blaming of the identified patient. We conclude by raising the implications of the present research study for the latent attributional work in clinical practice. We also stress the potential of discourse analysis methodology for studying blaming actions and for enhancing reflexivity about our models and practices. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:56, 25 December 2019
| Patrika2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Patrika2016 |
| Author(s) | Pinelopi Patrika, Eleftheria Tseliou |
| Title | Blame, responsibility and systemic neutrality: a discourse analysis methodology to the study of family therapy problem talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Family Therapy, Accountability, Discursive Psychology, EMCA, Troubles |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Family Therapy |
| Volume | 38 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 467–490 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-6427.12076 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this article we present discourse analysis of initial systemic family therapy sessions, focusing on family members' responses to therapists' attempts to introduce a systemically neutral, relational perspective on their troubles, by means of circular questioning and the final team message. The article draws from a qualitative study of family therapy problem talk with a sample of nine videotaped first and second sessions with six families and four therapists. The sessions were transcribed verbatim and subjected to discourse analysis following the discursive action model. Our analysis indicates that family members may decode the therapists' discursive moves as attributing blame or responsibility to them and engage in further blaming of the identified patient. We conclude by raising the implications of the present research study for the latent attributional work in clinical practice. We also stress the potential of discourse analysis methodology for studying blaming actions and for enhancing reflexivity about our models and practices.
Notes
