Difference between revisions of "Hata2016"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis;" to "Conversation Analysis;") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Hata2016 | |Key=Hata2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
| − | | | + | |Language=English |
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=101 | |Volume=101 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=138–154 |
| + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216616300248 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.006 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.006 | ||
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=In a trailoff environment, the turn-final conjunctional but is typically packaged with an immediately preceding constituent to form a single turn and sequentially displays a possible pragmatic completion point without syntactic completion of a turn (i.e. trailoff but). Utilising a conversation-analytic approach, this article investigates the sequential placement of trailoff but as a contrast-terminal token. In the extensive courses of action in institution settings, trailoff but is observed to facilitate a stepwise sequence-move in the trajectory of talk to pursue pre-determined interactional agendas. This article argues that the current but-turn illustrates: (a) possible completion of contrasting actions rather than just a turn itself or propositions; and (b) the readiness for a turn transition. The but-turn is thus not merely a continuation of the prior talk yet may operate to be a resource for participants to understand action-level completion with a projected contrast made salient, and therefore, no attempts to revisit the contrast are re-projected in a post-conjunctional space. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | In a trailoff environment, the turn-final conjunctional but is typically packaged with an immediately preceding constituent to form a single turn and sequentially displays a possible pragmatic completion point without syntactic completion of a turn (i.e. trailoff but). Utilising a conversation-analytic approach, this article investigates the sequential placement of trailoff but as a contrast-terminal token. In the extensive courses of action in institution settings, trailoff but is observed to facilitate a stepwise sequence-move in the trajectory of talk to pursue pre-determined interactional agendas. This article argues that the current but-turn illustrates: (a) possible completion of contrasting actions rather than just a turn itself or propositions; and (b) the readiness for a turn transition. The but-turn is thus not merely a continuation of the prior talk yet may operate to be a resource for participants to understand action-level completion with a projected contrast made salient, and therefore, no attempts to revisit the contrast are re-projected in a post-conjunctional space. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:05, 17 December 2019
| Hata2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hata2016 |
| Author(s) | Kazuki Hata |
| Title | Contrast-terminal: The sequential placement of trailoff but in extensive courses of action |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Turn-final but, Trailoff, Pragmatic completion, Contrast-terminal |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 101 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 138–154 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.006 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In a trailoff environment, the turn-final conjunctional but is typically packaged with an immediately preceding constituent to form a single turn and sequentially displays a possible pragmatic completion point without syntactic completion of a turn (i.e. trailoff but). Utilising a conversation-analytic approach, this article investigates the sequential placement of trailoff but as a contrast-terminal token. In the extensive courses of action in institution settings, trailoff but is observed to facilitate a stepwise sequence-move in the trajectory of talk to pursue pre-determined interactional agendas. This article argues that the current but-turn illustrates: (a) possible completion of contrasting actions rather than just a turn itself or propositions; and (b) the readiness for a turn transition. The but-turn is thus not merely a continuation of the prior talk yet may operate to be a resource for participants to understand action-level completion with a projected contrast made salient, and therefore, no attempts to revisit the contrast are re-projected in a post-conjunctional space.
Notes
