Difference between revisions of "Blythe2015"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Joe Blythe; |Title=Other-initiated repair in Murrinh-Patha |Tag(s)=EMCA; Other-initiated repair; Repair; Murrinh-Patha; Typology; |Key...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Joe Blythe; | + | |Author(s)=Joe Blythe; |
|Title=Other-initiated repair in Murrinh-Patha | |Title=Other-initiated repair in Murrinh-Patha | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Other-initiated repair; Repair; Murrinh-Patha; Typology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Other-initiated repair; Repair; Murrinh-Patha; Typology; |
|Key=Blythe2015 | |Key=Blythe2015 | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Open Linguistics | |Journal=Open Linguistics | ||
|Volume=1 | |Volume=1 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| + | |Pages=283–308 | ||
|URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2014.1.issue-1/opli-2015-0003/opli-2015-0003.xml?format=INT | |URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2014.1.issue-1/opli-2015-0003/opli-2015-0003.xml?format=INT | ||
|DOI=10.1515/opli-2015-0003 | |DOI=10.1515/opli-2015-0003 | ||
|Abstract=The range of linguistic structures and interactional practices associated with other-initiated repair (OIR) is surveyed for the Northern Australian language Murrinh-Patha. By drawing on a video corpus of informal Murrinh- Patha conversation, the OIR formats are compared in terms of their utility and versatility. Certain “restricted” formats have semantic properties that point to prior trouble source items. While these make the restricted repair initiators more specialised, the “open” formats are less well resourced semantically, which makes them more versatile. They tend to be used when the prior talk is potentially problematic in more ways than one. The open formats (especially thangku, “what?”) tend to solicit repair operations on each potential source of trouble, such that the resultant repair solution improves upon the troublesource turn in several ways. | |Abstract=The range of linguistic structures and interactional practices associated with other-initiated repair (OIR) is surveyed for the Northern Australian language Murrinh-Patha. By drawing on a video corpus of informal Murrinh- Patha conversation, the OIR formats are compared in terms of their utility and versatility. Certain “restricted” formats have semantic properties that point to prior trouble source items. While these make the restricted repair initiators more specialised, the “open” formats are less well resourced semantically, which makes them more versatile. They tend to be used when the prior talk is potentially problematic in more ways than one. The open formats (especially thangku, “what?”) tend to solicit repair operations on each potential source of trouble, such that the resultant repair solution improves upon the troublesource turn in several ways. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:55, 16 December 2019
| Blythe2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Blythe2015 |
| Author(s) | Joe Blythe |
| Title | Other-initiated repair in Murrinh-Patha |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Other-initiated repair, Repair, Murrinh-Patha, Typology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Open Linguistics |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 283–308 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/opli-2015-0003 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The range of linguistic structures and interactional practices associated with other-initiated repair (OIR) is surveyed for the Northern Australian language Murrinh-Patha. By drawing on a video corpus of informal Murrinh- Patha conversation, the OIR formats are compared in terms of their utility and versatility. Certain “restricted” formats have semantic properties that point to prior trouble source items. While these make the restricted repair initiators more specialised, the “open” formats are less well resourced semantically, which makes them more versatile. They tend to be used when the prior talk is potentially problematic in more ways than one. The open formats (especially thangku, “what?”) tend to solicit repair operations on each potential source of trouble, such that the resultant repair solution improves upon the troublesource turn in several ways.
Notes
