Difference between revisions of "Butterfield-Bhatta2015"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jeffrie Butterfield; Baikuntha Bhatta |Title=IRF sequences in team-teaching EFL classrooms |Tag(s)=EMCA; Classroom; Sequence organizatio...")
 
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|Key=Butterfield-Bhatta2015
 
|Key=Butterfield-Bhatta2015
 
|Year=2015
 
|Year=2015
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics
 
|Journal=The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics
 
|Volume=2
 
|Volume=2
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
|Pages=176-185
+
|Pages=176–185
 
|URL=http://caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/viewFile/241/363
 
|URL=http://caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/viewFile/241/363
|Abstract=In classrooms, teachers often ask students known-answer questions (e.g., Schegloff,
+
|Abstract=In classrooms, teachers often ask students known-answer questions (e.g., Schegloff, 2007), students respond, and teachers provide feedback about whether the response was correct. This sequence is often referred to as an Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) sequence. IRF sequences are a salient feature of classroom discourse first proposed by Sinclair and Coulthard (1975). In recent years team-teaching has become prevalent across Asia but research which investigates the interactional intricacies of team-teaching (e.g., Aline & Hosoda, 2006; J.-E. Park, 2014) is still rare. This study is one of the first to analyse how IRF sequences are performed in a team-teaching classroom and how teachers in team-teaching classrooms co-manage the interaction with the students before, after and during the IRF sequences. In addition, this study examines the process of speaker selection and the variety of forms the IRF can take, paying close attention to the interactional environment of each IRF sequence.
2007), students respond, and teachers provide feedback about whether the response
 
was correct. This sequence is often referred to as an Initiation-Response-Feedback
 
(IRF) sequence. IRF sequences are a salient feature of classroom discourse first
 
proposed by Sinclair and Coulthard (1975). In recent years team-teaching has become
 
prevalent across Asia but research which investigates the interactional intricacies of
 
team-teaching (e.g., Aline & Hosoda, 2006; J.-E. Park, 2014) is still rare. This study is
 
one of the first to analyse how IRF sequences are performed in a team-teaching
 
classroom and how teachers in team-teaching classrooms co-manage the interaction
 
with the students before, after and during the IRF sequences. In addition, this study
 
examines the process of speaker selection and the variety of forms the IRF can take,
 
paying close attention to the interactional environment of each IRF sequence.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:49, 16 December 2019

Butterfield-Bhatta2015
BibType ARTICLE
Key Butterfield-Bhatta2015
Author(s) Jeffrie Butterfield, Baikuntha Bhatta
Title IRF sequences in team-teaching EFL classrooms
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Classroom, Sequence organization, IRF sequences
Publisher
Year 2015
Language English
City
Month
Journal The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Volume 2
Number 3
Pages 176–185
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In classrooms, teachers often ask students known-answer questions (e.g., Schegloff, 2007), students respond, and teachers provide feedback about whether the response was correct. This sequence is often referred to as an Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) sequence. IRF sequences are a salient feature of classroom discourse first proposed by Sinclair and Coulthard (1975). In recent years team-teaching has become prevalent across Asia but research which investigates the interactional intricacies of team-teaching (e.g., Aline & Hosoda, 2006; J.-E. Park, 2014) is still rare. This study is one of the first to analyse how IRF sequences are performed in a team-teaching classroom and how teachers in team-teaching classrooms co-manage the interaction with the students before, after and during the IRF sequences. In addition, this study examines the process of speaker selection and the variety of forms the IRF can take, paying close attention to the interactional environment of each IRF sequence.

Notes