Difference between revisions of "HaughObana2015"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Michael Haugh; Yasuko Obana | |Author(s)=Michael Haugh; Yasuko Obana | ||
| − | |Title=Transformative continuations, (dis)affiliation, and accountability in Japanese | + | |Title=Transformative continuations, (dis)affiliation, and accountability in Japanese interaction |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; joint production; joint utterance; affiliation; alignment; Japanese; interactional pragmatics; transformative continuation; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; joint production; joint utterance; affiliation; alignment; Japanese; interactional pragmatics; transformative continuation; | ||
|Key=HaughObana2015 | |Key=HaughObana2015 | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
| − | |Journal=Text & Talk | + | |Language=English |
| + | |Journal=Text & Talk | ||
|Volume=35 | |Volume=35 | ||
|Number=5 | |Number=5 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=597–619 |
|URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/text.2015.35.issue-5/text-2015-0015/text-2015-0015.xml?format=INT | |URL=http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/text.2015.35.issue-5/text-2015-0015/text-2015-0015.xml?format=INT | ||
|DOI=10.1515/text-2015-0015 | |DOI=10.1515/text-2015-0015 | ||
|Abstract=Studies of joint productions have often focused on instances where a recipient anticipates through completions what a speaker might be about to say, or through expansion what that speaker could plausibly go on to say. However, recent work suggests that grammatically fitted continuations may also alter or redirect the projected trajectory of a prior speaker’s turn or utterance. In this paper, building on this prior work, we focus on cases in Japanese interaction where grammatically fitted continuations of one speaker’s turn or utterance by another speaker accomplished through “format tying” (Goodwin and Goodwin 1987) effects some kind of transformation of the action or stance implemented by that prior turn. We term these “transformative continuations,” and propose that while they are invariably disaligning, they may nevertheless implement both affiliative and disaffiliative stances. We propose that an analysis of transformative continuations thus leads us to a consideration of both the degree to which participants may orient to these as (dis)affiliative, as well as the ways in which the respective participants may be held accountable for such instances of joint production. | |Abstract=Studies of joint productions have often focused on instances where a recipient anticipates through completions what a speaker might be about to say, or through expansion what that speaker could plausibly go on to say. However, recent work suggests that grammatically fitted continuations may also alter or redirect the projected trajectory of a prior speaker’s turn or utterance. In this paper, building on this prior work, we focus on cases in Japanese interaction where grammatically fitted continuations of one speaker’s turn or utterance by another speaker accomplished through “format tying” (Goodwin and Goodwin 1987) effects some kind of transformation of the action or stance implemented by that prior turn. We term these “transformative continuations,” and propose that while they are invariably disaligning, they may nevertheless implement both affiliative and disaffiliative stances. We propose that an analysis of transformative continuations thus leads us to a consideration of both the degree to which participants may orient to these as (dis)affiliative, as well as the ways in which the respective participants may be held accountable for such instances of joint production. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:23, 15 December 2019
| HaughObana2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | HaughObana2015 |
| Author(s) | Michael Haugh, Yasuko Obana |
| Title | Transformative continuations, (dis)affiliation, and accountability in Japanese interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, joint production, joint utterance, affiliation, alignment, Japanese, interactional pragmatics, transformative continuation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Text & Talk |
| Volume | 35 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 597–619 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/text-2015-0015 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Studies of joint productions have often focused on instances where a recipient anticipates through completions what a speaker might be about to say, or through expansion what that speaker could plausibly go on to say. However, recent work suggests that grammatically fitted continuations may also alter or redirect the projected trajectory of a prior speaker’s turn or utterance. In this paper, building on this prior work, we focus on cases in Japanese interaction where grammatically fitted continuations of one speaker’s turn or utterance by another speaker accomplished through “format tying” (Goodwin and Goodwin 1987) effects some kind of transformation of the action or stance implemented by that prior turn. We term these “transformative continuations,” and propose that while they are invariably disaligning, they may nevertheless implement both affiliative and disaffiliative stances. We propose that an analysis of transformative continuations thus leads us to a consideration of both the degree to which participants may orient to these as (dis)affiliative, as well as the ways in which the respective participants may be held accountable for such instances of joint production.
Notes
