Difference between revisions of "Morriss2015"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lisa Morriss; |Title=Nut clusters and crisps: atrocity stories and co-narration in interviews with approved mental health professionals...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Lisa Morriss; | + | |Author(s)=Lisa Morriss; |
|Title=Nut clusters and crisps: atrocity stories and co-narration in interviews with approved mental health professionals | |Title=Nut clusters and crisps: atrocity stories and co-narration in interviews with approved mental health professionals | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; social work; atrocity stories; professional identity; interviews; co-narration; ethnomethodology; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; social work; atrocity stories; professional identity; interviews; co-narration; ethnomethodology; | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=7 | |Number=7 | ||
|Pages=1072–1085 | |Pages=1072–1085 | ||
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9566.12285 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.12285 | |DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.12285 | ||
| − | |Abstract=The article explores the telling of | + | |Abstract=The article explores the telling of co‐narrated atrocity stories in accomplishing professional identity. Building on previous work, it is argued that group membership is a prerequisite for such stories to be told. Extracts from empirical data from interviews with social work approved mental health professionals are analysed using an ethnomethodological approach. The findings show how atrocity stories can be co‐narrated, not only by longstanding colleagues, but also by two unacquainted persons who share the same professional identity. The article concludes that the ethnomethodological concepts of vulgar competency, unique adequacy, indexicality and the documentary method of interpretation are key to understanding the accomplishment of co‐narrated atrocity stories. |
| − | professional identity. Building on previous work, it is argued that group | ||
| − | membership is a prerequisite for such stories to be told. Extracts from empirical | ||
| − | data from interviews with social work approved mental health professionals are | ||
| − | analysed using an ethnomethodological approach. The | ||
| − | stories can be | ||
| − | unacquainted persons who share the same professional identity. The article | ||
| − | concludes that the ethnomethodological concepts of vulgar competency, unique | ||
| − | adequacy, indexicality and the documentary method of interpretation are key to | ||
| − | understanding the accomplishment of | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:07, 15 December 2019
| Morriss2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Morriss2015 |
| Author(s) | Lisa Morriss |
| Title | Nut clusters and crisps: atrocity stories and co-narration in interviews with approved mental health professionals |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, social work, atrocity stories, professional identity, interviews, co-narration, ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociology of Health & Illness |
| Volume | 37 |
| Number | 7 |
| Pages | 1072–1085 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.12285 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The article explores the telling of co‐narrated atrocity stories in accomplishing professional identity. Building on previous work, it is argued that group membership is a prerequisite for such stories to be told. Extracts from empirical data from interviews with social work approved mental health professionals are analysed using an ethnomethodological approach. The findings show how atrocity stories can be co‐narrated, not only by longstanding colleagues, but also by two unacquainted persons who share the same professional identity. The article concludes that the ethnomethodological concepts of vulgar competency, unique adequacy, indexicality and the documentary method of interpretation are key to understanding the accomplishment of co‐narrated atrocity stories.
Notes
