Difference between revisions of "Auer2014b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Peter Auer; |Title=Syntactic Structures and their Symbiotic Guests: Notes on Analepsis from the Perspective of On-Line Syntax |Tag(s)=I...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Peter Auer;  
+
|Author(s)=Peter Auer;
|Title=Syntactic Structures and their Symbiotic Guests: Notes on Analepsis from the Perspective of On-Line Syntax
+
|Title=Syntactic structures and their symbiotic guests: notes on analepsis from the perspective of on-line syntax
 
|Tag(s)=IL; Analepsis; On-line syntax; Structural latency;
 
|Tag(s)=IL; Analepsis; On-line syntax; Structural latency;
 
|Key=Auer2014b
 
|Key=Auer2014b
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=24
 
|Volume=24
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
|Pages=533-560
+
|Pages=533–560
|Abstract=The empirical focus of this paper is on utterances that re-use syntactic structures from a preceding syntactic unit. Next utterances of this type are usually treated as (coordination) ellipsis. It is argued that from an on-line perspective on spoken syntax, they are better described as structural latency: A grammatical structure already established remains available and can therefore be made use of with one  
+
|URL=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.24.3.05aue
or more of its slots being filled by new material. A variety of cases of this particular kind of conversational symbiosis are discussed. It is argued that they should receive a common treatment. A number of features of the general host/guest relationship are discussed.  
+
|DOI=10.1075/prag.24.3.05aue
+
|Abstract=The empirical focus of this paper is on utterances that re-use syntactic structures from a preceding syntactic unit. Next utterances of this type are usually treated as (coordination) ellipsis. It is argued that from an on-line perspective on spoken syntax, they are better described as structural latency: A grammatical structure already established remains available and can therefore be made use of with one or more of its slots being filled by new material. A variety of cases of this particular kind of conversational symbiosis are discussed. It is argued that they should receive a common treatment. A number of features of the general host/guest relationship are discussed.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 11 December 2019

Auer2014b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Auer2014b
Author(s) Peter Auer
Title Syntactic structures and their symbiotic guests: notes on analepsis from the perspective of on-line syntax
Editor(s)
Tag(s) IL, Analepsis, On-line syntax, Structural latency
Publisher
Year 2014
Language English
City
Month
Journal Pragmatics
Volume 24
Number 3
Pages 533–560
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/prag.24.3.05aue
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The empirical focus of this paper is on utterances that re-use syntactic structures from a preceding syntactic unit. Next utterances of this type are usually treated as (coordination) ellipsis. It is argued that from an on-line perspective on spoken syntax, they are better described as structural latency: A grammatical structure already established remains available and can therefore be made use of with one or more of its slots being filled by new material. A variety of cases of this particular kind of conversational symbiosis are discussed. It is argued that they should receive a common treatment. A number of features of the general host/guest relationship are discussed.

Notes