Difference between revisions of "Ford-etal2012"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Cecilia E. Ford; Sandra A. Thompson; Veronika Drake; |Title=Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation |Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Turntaking;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Cecilia E. Ford; Sandra A. Thompson; Veronika Drake; | |Author(s)=Cecilia E. Ford; Sandra A. Thompson; Veronika Drake; | ||
| − | |Title=Bodily- | + | |Title=Bodily-visual practices and turn continuation |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Turntaking; Turn construction; Mulimodality; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Turntaking; Turn construction; Mulimodality; |
|Key=Ford-etal2012 | |Key=Ford-etal2012 | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
|Volume=49 | |Volume=49 | ||
|Number=3-4 | |Number=3-4 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=192–212 |
| + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761 | |DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This article considers points in turn construction where conversation researchers | + | |Abstract=This article considers points in turn construction where conversation researchers have shown that talk routinely continues beyond possible turn completion, but where bodily-visual behavior doing such turn extension work is found. The bodily-visual behaviors examined share many features with verbal turn extensions, but it is argued that embodied movements have distinct properties that make them well-suited for specific kinds of social action, including stance display and by-play in relation to simultaneous verbal turns and sequences. |
| − | have shown that talk routinely continues beyond possible turn completion, but | ||
| − | where bodily-visual behavior doing such turn extension work is found. The bodily- | ||
| − | visual behaviors examined share many features with verbal turn extensions, but it | ||
| − | is argued that embodied movements have distinct properties that make them well- | ||
| − | suited for | ||
| − | relation to simultaneous verbal turns and sequences. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:06, 30 November 2019
| Ford-etal2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ford-etal2012 |
| Author(s) | Cecilia E. Ford, Sandra A. Thompson, Veronika Drake |
| Title | Bodily-visual practices and turn continuation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, IL, Turntaking, Turn construction, Mulimodality |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | 49 |
| Number | 3-4 |
| Pages | 192–212 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article considers points in turn construction where conversation researchers have shown that talk routinely continues beyond possible turn completion, but where bodily-visual behavior doing such turn extension work is found. The bodily-visual behaviors examined share many features with verbal turn extensions, but it is argued that embodied movements have distinct properties that make them well-suited for specific kinds of social action, including stance display and by-play in relation to simultaneous verbal turns and sequences.
Notes
