Difference between revisions of "Licoppe2012a"
(BibTeX auto import 2014-10-02 11:37:24) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
+ | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
+ | |Author(s)=Christian Licoppe; Julien Morel; | ||
+ | |Title=Video-in-interaction: “talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls | ||
+ | |Tag(s)=EMCA | ||
|Key=Licoppe2012a | |Key=Licoppe2012a | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
− | |Journal=Research on Language | + | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction |
− | |Number= | + | |Volume=45 |
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=4 |
+ | |Pages=399–429 | ||
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 | ||
+ | |Abstract=In this article, we report a study of the uses of mobile video telephony based on the collection and analysis of naturally occurring mobile and Skype video exchanges, with a focus on camera motions. We provide evidence for a set of phenomena characteristic of the organization of “video-in-interaction”: (a) mobile and Skype video calls are patterned, often alternating between a “talking heads” arrangement, in which both participants are on-screen and facing the camera, and moments in which they are producing various shots of their environment in line with their current interactional purposes; (b) openings occur almost always in the talking heads arrangement; (c) the video images on either side are produced and expected to be scrutinized with respect to their relevance to the ongoing interaction; (d) the talking heads arrangement is oriented to a default mode of interaction, with the implication that when there is nothing else relevant to show, the participants should show themselves on-screen; (e) in multiparty interactions, the party who is handling the video communication apparatus has an obligation to put other speakers on-screen when they talk, and the video callers orient to their appearance on-screen as making a distinctive participation status relevant. We show how these phenomena all derive from an orientation toward a single maxim, “put the face of the current speaker on-screen,” which plays a foundational role in the organization of video-in-interaction and its articulation with that of talk-in-interaction. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 09:02, 30 November 2019
Licoppe2012a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Licoppe2012a |
Author(s) | Christian Licoppe, Julien Morel |
Title | Video-in-interaction: “talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA |
Publisher | |
Year | 2012 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
Volume | 45 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 399–429 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In this article, we report a study of the uses of mobile video telephony based on the collection and analysis of naturally occurring mobile and Skype video exchanges, with a focus on camera motions. We provide evidence for a set of phenomena characteristic of the organization of “video-in-interaction”: (a) mobile and Skype video calls are patterned, often alternating between a “talking heads” arrangement, in which both participants are on-screen and facing the camera, and moments in which they are producing various shots of their environment in line with their current interactional purposes; (b) openings occur almost always in the talking heads arrangement; (c) the video images on either side are produced and expected to be scrutinized with respect to their relevance to the ongoing interaction; (d) the talking heads arrangement is oriented to a default mode of interaction, with the implication that when there is nothing else relevant to show, the participants should show themselves on-screen; (e) in multiparty interactions, the party who is handling the video communication apparatus has an obligation to put other speakers on-screen when they talk, and the video callers orient to their appearance on-screen as making a distinctive participation status relevant. We show how these phenomena all derive from an orientation toward a single maxim, “put the face of the current speaker on-screen,” which plays a foundational role in the organization of video-in-interaction and its articulation with that of talk-in-interaction.
Notes