Difference between revisions of "Hutchby2011"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; |Title=Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Broadcast; Hybri...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; | + | |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; |
|Title=Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview | |Title=Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Broadcast; Hybrid discourse; Infotainment; News interviews; Political communication; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Broadcast; Hybrid discourse; Infotainment; News interviews; Political communication; |
|Key=Hutchby2011 | |Key=Hutchby2011 | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
| − | |Volume= | + | |Volume=13 |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=147–171 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445611400665 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1461445611400665 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445611400665 | ||
|Abstract=This article explores the nature of argumentative interaction in the hybrid political interview: a broadcast news genre whose discourse positions the journalist not just as investigator but as socio-political advocate. Such interviews offer explicit challenges to the traditionally conceived ‘neutral’ role of the broadcast news journalist. Interviewer ‘non-neutrality’ is examined in contexts where the speech exchange system shifts into the unmitigated and aggravated opposition characteristic of argument. Drawing on a sample of interviews involving different hosts, I analyse the structural features of both interviewer and interviewee turns that occur in these environments. I do this in relation both to sequential matters — that is, the types of turns taken and their relations with other turns in their immediate environment — and to matters of the substantive content of utterances — that is, what speakers are saying and/or the way they are saying it. | |Abstract=This article explores the nature of argumentative interaction in the hybrid political interview: a broadcast news genre whose discourse positions the journalist not just as investigator but as socio-political advocate. Such interviews offer explicit challenges to the traditionally conceived ‘neutral’ role of the broadcast news journalist. Interviewer ‘non-neutrality’ is examined in contexts where the speech exchange system shifts into the unmitigated and aggravated opposition characteristic of argument. Drawing on a sample of interviews involving different hosts, I analyse the structural features of both interviewer and interviewee turns that occur in these environments. I do this in relation both to sequential matters — that is, the types of turns taken and their relations with other turns in their immediate environment — and to matters of the substantive content of utterances — that is, what speakers are saying and/or the way they are saying it. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:05, 28 November 2019
| Hutchby2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hutchby2011 |
| Author(s) | Ian Hutchby |
| Title | Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Broadcast, Hybrid discourse, Infotainment, News interviews, Political communication |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 147–171 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445611400665 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article explores the nature of argumentative interaction in the hybrid political interview: a broadcast news genre whose discourse positions the journalist not just as investigator but as socio-political advocate. Such interviews offer explicit challenges to the traditionally conceived ‘neutral’ role of the broadcast news journalist. Interviewer ‘non-neutrality’ is examined in contexts where the speech exchange system shifts into the unmitigated and aggravated opposition characteristic of argument. Drawing on a sample of interviews involving different hosts, I analyse the structural features of both interviewer and interviewee turns that occur in these environments. I do this in relation both to sequential matters — that is, the types of turns taken and their relations with other turns in their immediate environment — and to matters of the substantive content of utterances — that is, what speakers are saying and/or the way they are saying it.
Notes
