Difference between revisions of "Keevallik2011d"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; |Title=Interrogative 'complements' and question design in Estonian |Editor(s)=Ritva Laury; Ryoko Suzuki; |Tag(s)=E...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
|Booktitle=Subordination in Conversation: A cross-linguistic perspective | |Booktitle=Subordination in Conversation: A cross-linguistic perspective | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=37–68 |
| + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.24.04kee | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1075/slsi.24.04kee | ||
|Series=Studies in Language and Social Interaction | |Series=Studies in Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Abstract=Some interrogative subject and object complement clauses are not treated as subordinate in Estonian interaction. They are interactionally profiled, as participants answer them as questions. Grammatically, they behave like independent clauses, displaying inversion and the turn-final question particle vä/ve. The main clauses considered in the chapter, ütle/öelge 'say!', räägi 'talk/tell!', ei tea 'not know', and uvitav 'interesting', instead function as (epistemic) particles projecting and designing questions in a sequentially and interpersonally sensitive way. | |Abstract=Some interrogative subject and object complement clauses are not treated as subordinate in Estonian interaction. They are interactionally profiled, as participants answer them as questions. Grammatically, they behave like independent clauses, displaying inversion and the turn-final question particle vä/ve. The main clauses considered in the chapter, ütle/öelge 'say!', räägi 'talk/tell!', ei tea 'not know', and uvitav 'interesting', instead function as (epistemic) particles projecting and designing questions in a sequentially and interpersonally sensitive way. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:52, 28 November 2019
| Keevallik2011d | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Keevallik2011d |
| Author(s) | Leelo Keevallik |
| Title | Interrogative 'complements' and question design in Estonian |
| Editor(s) | Ritva Laury, Ryoko Suzuki |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Interactional linguistics, interrogative complements, indirect questions, Epistemics, Particles |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 37–68 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/slsi.24.04kee |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | Studies in Language and Social Interaction |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Subordination in Conversation: A cross-linguistic perspective |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Some interrogative subject and object complement clauses are not treated as subordinate in Estonian interaction. They are interactionally profiled, as participants answer them as questions. Grammatically, they behave like independent clauses, displaying inversion and the turn-final question particle vä/ve. The main clauses considered in the chapter, ütle/öelge 'say!', räägi 'talk/tell!', ei tea 'not know', and uvitav 'interesting', instead function as (epistemic) particles projecting and designing questions in a sequentially and interpersonally sensitive way.
Notes
