Difference between revisions of "Mondada2011f"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Gestures in overlap: The situated establishment of speakership | |Title=Gestures in overlap: The situated establishment of speakership | ||
|Editor(s)=Gale Stam; Mika Ishino; | |Editor(s)=Gale Stam; Mika Ishino; | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Embodied interaction; Overlap; Turn taking; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Embodied interaction; Overlap; Turn taking; |
|Key=Mondada2011f | |Key=Mondada2011f | ||
| − | |Publisher=John Benjamins | + | |Publisher=John Benjamins |
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
|Chapter=24 | |Chapter=24 | ||
|Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam/Philadelphia | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Integrating Gestures: The | + | |Booktitle=Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture |
|Pages=321–338 | |Pages=321–338 | ||
| + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/gs.4.29mon | ||
|DOI=10.1075/gs.4.29mon | |DOI=10.1075/gs.4.29mon | ||
|Abstract=This paper aims at contributing to the analysis of overlaps in turns-at-talk from both a sequential and a multimodal perspective. Overlaps have been studied within Conversation Analysis by focusing mainly on verbal and vocal resources; taking into account multimodal resources such as gesture, bodily posture, and gaze contributes to a better understanding of participants’ orientations to the sequential organization of overlapping talk and their management of speakership.First, we introduce the way in which overlaps have been studied in Conversation Analysis, mainly by Jefferson (1973, 1983, 2004) and Schegloff (2000); then we propose possible implications of their multimodal analysis. In order to demonstrate that speakers systematically orient to the overlap onset and resolution we analyze the multimodal conduct of overlapped speakers. Findings show methodical variations in trajectories of overlap resolution: speakers’ gestures in overlap display themselves as maintaining or withdrawing their turn, thereby exhibiting the speakership achieved and negotiated during overlap. | |Abstract=This paper aims at contributing to the analysis of overlaps in turns-at-talk from both a sequential and a multimodal perspective. Overlaps have been studied within Conversation Analysis by focusing mainly on verbal and vocal resources; taking into account multimodal resources such as gesture, bodily posture, and gaze contributes to a better understanding of participants’ orientations to the sequential organization of overlapping talk and their management of speakership.First, we introduce the way in which overlaps have been studied in Conversation Analysis, mainly by Jefferson (1973, 1983, 2004) and Schegloff (2000); then we propose possible implications of their multimodal analysis. In order to demonstrate that speakers systematically orient to the overlap onset and resolution we analyze the multimodal conduct of overlapped speakers. Findings show methodical variations in trajectories of overlap resolution: speakers’ gestures in overlap display themselves as maintaining or withdrawing their turn, thereby exhibiting the speakership achieved and negotiated during overlap. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:34, 28 November 2019
| Mondada2011f | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Mondada2011f |
| Author(s) | Lorenza Mondada, Florence Oloff |
| Title | Gestures in overlap: The situated establishment of speakership |
| Editor(s) | Gale Stam, Mika Ishino |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Embodied interaction, Overlap, Turn taking |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | Amsterdam/Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 321–338 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/gs.4.29mon |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture |
| Chapter | 24 |
Abstract
This paper aims at contributing to the analysis of overlaps in turns-at-talk from both a sequential and a multimodal perspective. Overlaps have been studied within Conversation Analysis by focusing mainly on verbal and vocal resources; taking into account multimodal resources such as gesture, bodily posture, and gaze contributes to a better understanding of participants’ orientations to the sequential organization of overlapping talk and their management of speakership.First, we introduce the way in which overlaps have been studied in Conversation Analysis, mainly by Jefferson (1973, 1983, 2004) and Schegloff (2000); then we propose possible implications of their multimodal analysis. In order to demonstrate that speakers systematically orient to the overlap onset and resolution we analyze the multimodal conduct of overlapped speakers. Findings show methodical variations in trajectories of overlap resolution: speakers’ gestures in overlap display themselves as maintaining or withdrawing their turn, thereby exhibiting the speakership achieved and negotiated during overlap.
Notes
