Difference between revisions of "Plug2010"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Leendert Plug; |Title=Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology, with reference to some Dutch phrases |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation A...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Leendert Plug; | + | |Author(s)=Leendert Plug; |
|Title=Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology, with reference to some Dutch phrases | |Title=Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology, with reference to some Dutch phrases | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Usage-based phonology; Phonetics; Phonetic reduction | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Usage-based phonology; Phonetics; Phonetic reduction | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=42 | |Volume=42 | ||
|Number=7 | |Number=7 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=2014–2035 |
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216609003178 | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216609003178 | ||
− | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.001 |
|Abstract=This paper explores the representation of pragmatic constraints on speech production in the framework of Usage-based Phonology. It presents an empirical account of the pragmatic function and phonetic form of a set of Dutch phrases and shows that frequency of usage, which has been a main focus of usage-based linguistic research, does not suffice to explain the observed phonetic patterns. Reference to a pragmatic level of organisation is crucial, and the remainder of the paper is concerned with accommodating this level of organisation in a usage-based representational framework. The paper outlines an account in which pragmatic constraints are categories of lexical organisation, and generalisations about the linguistic design of particular pragmatic contexts are encoded in cognitive schemas. The paper suggests that the account is broadly compatible with views on the role of pragmatics in linguistic representation put forward in the Conversation Analysis literature. | |Abstract=This paper explores the representation of pragmatic constraints on speech production in the framework of Usage-based Phonology. It presents an empirical account of the pragmatic function and phonetic form of a set of Dutch phrases and shows that frequency of usage, which has been a main focus of usage-based linguistic research, does not suffice to explain the observed phonetic patterns. Reference to a pragmatic level of organisation is crucial, and the remainder of the paper is concerned with accommodating this level of organisation in a usage-based representational framework. The paper outlines an account in which pragmatic constraints are categories of lexical organisation, and generalisations about the linguistic design of particular pragmatic contexts are encoded in cognitive schemas. The paper suggests that the account is broadly compatible with views on the role of pragmatics in linguistic representation put forward in the Conversation Analysis literature. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 08:16, 25 November 2019
Plug2010 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Plug2010 |
Author(s) | Leendert Plug |
Title | Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology, with reference to some Dutch phrases |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Usage-based phonology, Phonetics, Phonetic reduction |
Publisher | |
Year | 2010 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 42 |
Number | 7 |
Pages | 2014–2035 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.001 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper explores the representation of pragmatic constraints on speech production in the framework of Usage-based Phonology. It presents an empirical account of the pragmatic function and phonetic form of a set of Dutch phrases and shows that frequency of usage, which has been a main focus of usage-based linguistic research, does not suffice to explain the observed phonetic patterns. Reference to a pragmatic level of organisation is crucial, and the remainder of the paper is concerned with accommodating this level of organisation in a usage-based representational framework. The paper outlines an account in which pragmatic constraints are categories of lexical organisation, and generalisations about the linguistic design of particular pragmatic contexts are encoded in cognitive schemas. The paper suggests that the account is broadly compatible with views on the role of pragmatics in linguistic representation put forward in the Conversation Analysis literature.
Notes