Difference between revisions of "Beach1993"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Beach1993 | |Key=Beach1993 | ||
|Year=1993 | |Year=1993 | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=19 | |Volume=19 | ||
Latest revision as of 13:01, 24 November 2019
| Beach1993 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Beach1993 |
| Author(s) | Wayne A. Beach |
| Title | Transitional regularities for 'casual' “Okay” usages |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1993 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 325–352 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
An understanding of “Okay” usages in conversation requires analytic considerations extending beyond free-standing and non-continuative deployments. Relying on previous findings on how recipients and current speakers organize such activities as phone openings and closings, the present analysis addresses a wider variety of interactional environments in establishing certain predominant and thus fundamental features. Those addressed herein include how recipients and current speakers rely on “Okay” pivotally, at or near transition/opportunity spaces: Decidedly in response to prior talk, yet also in transitionally relevant (‘state of readiness’) ways via shifts/ movements to next-positioned matters. Though recipients or current speakers may (in next turn) treat prior “Okay” usages as non-continuative, and/or move to sequentially delete the actions “Okay” was taken to be projecting (i.e., ‘Okay + [fuller turn]’), just what participants appear to be prefacing or setting-up via “Okay” is recurrently (and eventually) apparent.
Notes
