Difference between revisions of "Have2002"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Paul ten Have; | |Author(s)=Paul ten Have; | ||
| − | |Title=The | + | |Title=The notion of member is the heart of the matter: on the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Basic Resources; Membership; Ethnomethodology; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Basic Resources; Membership; Ethnomethodology; | ||
|Key=Have2002 | |Key=Have2002 | ||
|Year=2002 | |Year=2002 | ||
|Howpublished=Online journal | |Howpublished=Online journal | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research | |Journal=Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research | ||
|Volume=3 | |Volume=3 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |URL=http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs- | + | |URL=http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/834 |
| − | |Note= | + | |DOI=10.17169/fqs-3.3.834 |
| + | |Note=Reprinted 2005 in Journal: Historical Social Research / Historische Soziakforschung 30: 28-53 | ||
| − | + | Translated as 'Predstava clena je jadrom veci: O úlohe clenkého vedenia v etnometodologikom výskué', in: Biograf 32, 2003: 3-29 | |
| + | |Abstract=In ethnomethodological inquiries, the tension between "subjectivity" and "objectivity" which is inherent in all qualitative social research, takes special meanings. In fact, those terms are rarely used in ethnomethodological research reports, or methodological writings. What is widely implied and often explicitly recognised, however, is that an ethnomethodologist has to "understand" the practices studied, before they can be analysed, and that this "understanding" involves the researcher using his or her "membership knowledge". In a way, this unavoidable use of membership knowledge for understanding what people are doing, is then turned from a implicit resource into an explicit topic for analysis. This can be illustrated by a consideration of the two research strategies for which ethnomethodology has become (ill-) famous, the "breaching experiments" initiated by its founder Harold GARFINKEL, and the use of recordings and transcripts of verbal interaction by ethnomethodology's most successful off-shoot, Conversation Analysis as initiated by Harvey SACKS. Varieties of a third strategy, ethnography, including the ethnography of specific (sub-) cultural practices, of technology use, and auto-ethnography, will also be discussed for its treatment of membership knowledge as resource and topic. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:57, 24 November 2019
| Have2002 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Have2002 |
| Author(s) | Paul ten Have |
| Title | The notion of member is the heart of the matter: on the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Basic Resources, Membership, Ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.17169/fqs-3.3.834 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | Online journal |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In ethnomethodological inquiries, the tension between "subjectivity" and "objectivity" which is inherent in all qualitative social research, takes special meanings. In fact, those terms are rarely used in ethnomethodological research reports, or methodological writings. What is widely implied and often explicitly recognised, however, is that an ethnomethodologist has to "understand" the practices studied, before they can be analysed, and that this "understanding" involves the researcher using his or her "membership knowledge". In a way, this unavoidable use of membership knowledge for understanding what people are doing, is then turned from a implicit resource into an explicit topic for analysis. This can be illustrated by a consideration of the two research strategies for which ethnomethodology has become (ill-) famous, the "breaching experiments" initiated by its founder Harold GARFINKEL, and the use of recordings and transcripts of verbal interaction by ethnomethodology's most successful off-shoot, Conversation Analysis as initiated by Harvey SACKS. Varieties of a third strategy, ethnography, including the ethnography of specific (sub-) cultural practices, of technology use, and auto-ethnography, will also be discussed for its treatment of membership knowledge as resource and topic.
Notes
Reprinted 2005 in Journal: Historical Social Research / Historische Soziakforschung 30: 28-53
Translated as 'Predstava clena je jadrom veci: O úlohe clenkého vedenia v etnometodologikom výskué', in: Biograf 32, 2003: 3-29
