Difference between revisions of "Haddington2006"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Pentti Haddington;
 
|Author(s)=Pentti Haddington;
 
|Title=The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking
 
|Title=The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze; Assessments; Stance Taking;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze; Assessments; Stance Taking;
 
|Key=Haddington2006
 
|Key=Haddington2006
 
|Year=2006
 
|Year=2006
|Month=January
 
 
|Journal=Text & Talk
 
|Journal=Text & Talk
 
|Volume=26
 
|Volume=26

Latest revision as of 12:55, 24 November 2019

Haddington2006
BibType ARTICLE
Key Haddington2006
Author(s) Pentti Haddington
Title The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Gaze, Assessments, Stance Taking
Publisher
Year 2006
Language
City
Month
Journal Text & Talk
Volume 26
Number 3
Pages 281–328
URL Link
DOI 10.1515/TEXT.2006.012
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper aims to shed light on the question of how interactants use the concurrent organizations of assessments and three different gaze patterns as resources for stance taking in everyday conversation. The data come from two recordings of everyday conversation. The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, it aims to show that stance taking is an intersubjective and collaborative social activity in which interactants, by relying on various linguistic and interactional resources, construct stances based on stances by prior speakers. Second, it suggests that the investigated three gaze patterns play an important role in the stance-taking activity. The data show that although the interrelationship between gaze and assessments is manifold, certain gaze patterns are interdependent with the making of assessments and therefore gaze and assessments can be seen to function together as resources for interactional stance taking. Additionally, these gaze patterns act as resources for the coparticipants in tracing the meanings of coparticipants' stances. However, it is not claimed that these gaze patterns have meanings in themselves or that they would implicate a speaker stance, but rather that together with language, gaze is an important element in interactants' intersubjective stance taking.

Notes