Difference between revisions of "Beach2009a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; |Title=Between Dad and Son: Initiating, Delivering, and Assimilating Bad Cancer News |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical; Cancer; Bad...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; | + | |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; |
− | |Title=Between | + | |Title=Between dad and son: initiating, delivering, and assimilating bad cancer news |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical; Cancer; Bad News; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical; Cancer; Bad News; | ||
|Key=Beach2009a | |Key=Beach2009a | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=271–298 | |Pages=271–298 | ||
− | | | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327027HC1403_1 |
− | |Abstract=The | + | |DOI=10.1207/S15327027HC1403_1 |
− | time, that his | + | |Abstract=The opening moments of a phone call reveal how a father informs his son, for the 1st time, that his mom's tumor is malignant. An extended phone opening reveals how delaying talk about the mom's condition allows for important interactional work: Displaying resistance to announce the bad news directly, projecting and anticipating the valence of forthcoming news prior to its announcement, and delicately sharing ownership of a serious health condition at the outset of a family cancer journey. Enacting a biomedical demeanor, replete with technical language and withholdings of emotional and personal reactions, subsequent delivery and reception of the bad news is managed stoically-a normalized resource employed by consequential figures when managing and coping with dreaded news events. By closely examining how family members talk through cancer on the telephone, the scope of health communication research is extended beyond clinical settings into home environments, progress is made on the noticeable absence of interactional studies in psycho-oncology, and diverse implications arise for understanding how lay persons diagnose and manage illness dilemmas. |
− | delaying talk about the | ||
− | Displaying resistance to announce the bad news directly, projecting and | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Enacting a biomedical demeanor, replete with technical language and withholdings | ||
− | of emotional and personal reactions, subsequent delivery and reception of the bad | ||
− | news is managed | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | progress | ||
− | |||
− | manage illness dilemmas. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:03, 23 November 2019
Beach2009a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Beach2009a |
Author(s) | Wayne A. Beach |
Title | Between dad and son: initiating, delivering, and assimilating bad cancer news |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical, Cancer, Bad News |
Publisher | |
Year | 2009 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Health Communication |
Volume | 14 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 271–298 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1207/S15327027HC1403_1 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
The opening moments of a phone call reveal how a father informs his son, for the 1st time, that his mom's tumor is malignant. An extended phone opening reveals how delaying talk about the mom's condition allows for important interactional work: Displaying resistance to announce the bad news directly, projecting and anticipating the valence of forthcoming news prior to its announcement, and delicately sharing ownership of a serious health condition at the outset of a family cancer journey. Enacting a biomedical demeanor, replete with technical language and withholdings of emotional and personal reactions, subsequent delivery and reception of the bad news is managed stoically-a normalized resource employed by consequential figures when managing and coping with dreaded news events. By closely examining how family members talk through cancer on the telephone, the scope of health communication research is extended beyond clinical settings into home environments, progress is made on the noticeable absence of interactional studies in psycho-oncology, and diverse implications arise for understanding how lay persons diagnose and manage illness dilemmas.
Notes