Difference between revisions of "Hellermann2009b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Hellermann; |Title=Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair b...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=John Hellermann;  
+
|Author(s)=John Hellermann;
 
|Title=Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English
 
|Title=Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Repair; Language Learning; Longitudinal Study; Conversation Analysis; Classroom interactions;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Repair; Language Learning; Longitudinal Study; Conversation Analysis; Classroom interactions;
 
|Key=Hellermann2009b
 
|Key=Hellermann2009b
 
|Year=2009
 
|Year=2009
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=53
 
|Volume=53
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
|Pages=113-132
+
|Pages=113–132
 
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00313830902757550
 
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00313830902757550
|DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757550
+
|DOI=10.1080/00313830902757550
 
|Abstract=This paper uses methods from conversation analysis to investigate a well‐documented practice from mundane conversation (self‐initiated self‐repair) as it is accomplished during the interactions of one adult learner of English. The interactions took place during her classroom talk‐in‐interaction over the course of 18 months. The research describes the placement of repair initiations, the production practices used for initiation and repair, the activity contexts within which the repairs took place, and how the production of repair might give us a clue to emerging syntactic organization of language learners. By focusing on participant‐relevant language practices like self‐initiated self‐repair this research will add to socio‐cultural understandings of language learning and addresses the call for more longitudinal research in the area.
 
|Abstract=This paper uses methods from conversation analysis to investigate a well‐documented practice from mundane conversation (self‐initiated self‐repair) as it is accomplished during the interactions of one adult learner of English. The interactions took place during her classroom talk‐in‐interaction over the course of 18 months. The research describes the placement of repair initiations, the production practices used for initiation and repair, the activity contexts within which the repairs took place, and how the production of repair might give us a clue to emerging syntactic organization of language learners. By focusing on participant‐relevant language practices like self‐initiated self‐repair this research will add to socio‐cultural understandings of language learning and addresses the call for more longitudinal research in the area.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:52, 23 November 2019

Hellermann2009b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Hellermann2009b
Author(s) John Hellermann
Title Looking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair: A case study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of English
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Repair, Language Learning, Longitudinal Study, Conversation Analysis, Classroom interactions
Publisher
Year 2009
Language
City
Month
Journal Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
Volume 53
Number 2
Pages 113–132
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/00313830902757550
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper uses methods from conversation analysis to investigate a well‐documented practice from mundane conversation (self‐initiated self‐repair) as it is accomplished during the interactions of one adult learner of English. The interactions took place during her classroom talk‐in‐interaction over the course of 18 months. The research describes the placement of repair initiations, the production practices used for initiation and repair, the activity contexts within which the repairs took place, and how the production of repair might give us a clue to emerging syntactic organization of language learners. By focusing on participant‐relevant language practices like self‐initiated self‐repair this research will add to socio‐cultural understandings of language learning and addresses the call for more longitudinal research in the area.

Notes