Difference between revisions of "Housley2009"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=William Housley; Richard Fitzgerald; |Title=Membership categorization, culture and norms in action |Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categorizat...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=William Housley; Richard Fitzgerald; | + | |Author(s)=William Housley; Richard Fitzgerald; |
|Title=Membership categorization, culture and norms in action | |Title=Membership categorization, culture and norms in action | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categorization Analysis; Morality; Norms; Politics; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categorization Analysis; Morality; Norms; Politics; |
|Key=Housley2009 | |Key=Housley2009 | ||
|Year=2009 | |Year=2009 | ||
+ | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse & Society | |Journal=Discourse & Society | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
− | |URL= | + | |Pages=345–362 |
+ | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0957926509102405 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/0957926509102405 | |DOI=10.1177/0957926509102405 | ||
|Abstract=In this article, we examine the extent to which membership categorization analysis (MCA) can inform an understanding of reasoning within the public domain where morality, policy and cultural politics are visible (Smith and Tatalovich, 2003). Through the examination of three examples, we demonstrate how specific types of category device(s) are a ubiquitous feature of accountable practice in the public domain where morality matters and public policy intersect. Furthermore, we argue that MCA provides a method for analysing the mundane mechanics associated with everyday cultural politics and democratic accountability assembled and presented within news media and broadcast settings. | |Abstract=In this article, we examine the extent to which membership categorization analysis (MCA) can inform an understanding of reasoning within the public domain where morality, policy and cultural politics are visible (Smith and Tatalovich, 2003). Through the examination of three examples, we demonstrate how specific types of category device(s) are a ubiquitous feature of accountable practice in the public domain where morality matters and public policy intersect. Furthermore, we argue that MCA provides a method for analysing the mundane mechanics associated with everyday cultural politics and democratic accountability assembled and presented within news media and broadcast settings. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:49, 23 November 2019
Housley2009 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Housley2009 |
Author(s) | William Housley, Richard Fitzgerald |
Title | Membership categorization, culture and norms in action |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Membership Categorization Analysis, Morality, Norms, Politics |
Publisher | |
Year | 2009 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse & Society |
Volume | 20 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 345–362 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0957926509102405 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In this article, we examine the extent to which membership categorization analysis (MCA) can inform an understanding of reasoning within the public domain where morality, policy and cultural politics are visible (Smith and Tatalovich, 2003). Through the examination of three examples, we demonstrate how specific types of category device(s) are a ubiquitous feature of accountable practice in the public domain where morality matters and public policy intersect. Furthermore, we argue that MCA provides a method for analysing the mundane mechanics associated with everyday cultural politics and democratic accountability assembled and presented within news media and broadcast settings.
Notes