Difference between revisions of "Williams2009"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Val Williams; Lisa Ponting; Kerrie Ford; Philippa Rudge |Title="A Bit of Common Ground": Personalisation and the Use of Shared Knowledge...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Val Williams; Lisa Ponting; Kerrie Ford; Philippa Rudge
 
|Author(s)=Val Williams; Lisa Ponting; Kerrie Ford; Philippa Rudge
|Title="A Bit of Common Ground": Personalisation and the Use of Shared Knowledge in Interactions between People with Learning Disabilities and Their Personal Assistants
+
|Title=“A bit of common ground”: personalisation and the use of shared knowledge in interactions between people with learning disabilities and their personal assistants
 
|Tag(s)=autonomy; choice; control; institutional asymmetry; learning disability; personalisation
 
|Tag(s)=autonomy; choice; control; institutional asymmetry; learning disability; personalisation
 
|Key=Williams2009
 
|Key=Williams2009
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Number=5
 
|Number=5
 
|Pages=607–624
 
|Pages=607–624
|URL=http://dis.sagepub.com/content/11/5/607
+
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445609341008
 
|DOI=10.1177/1461445609341008
 
|DOI=10.1177/1461445609341008
 
|Abstract=Personalisation is the new mantra in social care; this article focuses on how personalisation can be achieved in practice, by presenting an analysis of data from people with learning disabilities and their personal assistants (PAs), where traditional care relationships have often been shown to be disempowering (Antaki et al., 2007b). The focus here is on the ways in which both parties use references to shared knowledge, joint experiences or personal-life information. These strategies can be used for various social goals, and instances are given where shared references are used during non task-related talk. Both parties are seen on occasion to attempt to refer to shared information, and dense layers of inference can result, which move the interaction onto an ordinary, more symmetrical and friendly footing. The article concludes that shared knowledge referencing creates a way to shift between the personal and the professional, to blur the boundaries, and to create a new and more personalised relationship.
 
|Abstract=Personalisation is the new mantra in social care; this article focuses on how personalisation can be achieved in practice, by presenting an analysis of data from people with learning disabilities and their personal assistants (PAs), where traditional care relationships have often been shown to be disempowering (Antaki et al., 2007b). The focus here is on the ways in which both parties use references to shared knowledge, joint experiences or personal-life information. These strategies can be used for various social goals, and instances are given where shared references are used during non task-related talk. Both parties are seen on occasion to attempt to refer to shared information, and dense layers of inference can result, which move the interaction onto an ordinary, more symmetrical and friendly footing. The article concludes that shared knowledge referencing creates a way to shift between the personal and the professional, to blur the boundaries, and to create a new and more personalised relationship.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 02:09, 23 November 2019

Williams2009
BibType ARTICLE
Key Williams2009
Author(s) Val Williams, Lisa Ponting, Kerrie Ford, Philippa Rudge
Title “A bit of common ground”: personalisation and the use of shared knowledge in interactions between people with learning disabilities and their personal assistants
Editor(s)
Tag(s) autonomy, choice, control, institutional asymmetry, learning disability, personalisation
Publisher
Year 2009
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 11
Number 5
Pages 607–624
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445609341008
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Personalisation is the new mantra in social care; this article focuses on how personalisation can be achieved in practice, by presenting an analysis of data from people with learning disabilities and their personal assistants (PAs), where traditional care relationships have often been shown to be disempowering (Antaki et al., 2007b). The focus here is on the ways in which both parties use references to shared knowledge, joint experiences or personal-life information. These strategies can be used for various social goals, and instances are given where shared references are used during non task-related talk. Both parties are seen on occasion to attempt to refer to shared information, and dense layers of inference can result, which move the interaction onto an ordinary, more symmetrical and friendly footing. The article concludes that shared knowledge referencing creates a way to shift between the personal and the professional, to blur the boundaries, and to create a new and more personalised relationship.

Notes