Difference between revisions of "Burke2008"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Shaunna Burke; Andrew C. Sparkes; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson |Title=High Altitude Climbers as Ethnomethodologists Making Sense of Cogniti...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Shaunna Burke; Andrew C. Sparkes; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson | |Author(s)=Shaunna Burke; Andrew C. Sparkes; Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson | ||
| − | |Title=High | + | |Title=High altitude climbers as ethnomethodologists making sense of cognitive dissonance: ethnographic insights from an attempt to scale Mt. Everest |
|Tag(s)=Ethnomethodology; High Altitude Climbers; Cognitive Dissonance | |Tag(s)=Ethnomethodology; High Altitude Climbers; Cognitive Dissonance | ||
|Key=Burke2008 | |Key=Burke2008 | ||
|Year=2008 | |Year=2008 | ||
| − | |Journal=Sport | + | |Journal=Sport Psychologist |
|Volume=22 | |Volume=22 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=336–355 | |Pages=336–355 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/tsp/22/3/article-p336.xml |
| + | |DOI=10.1123/tsp.22.3.336 | ||
|Abstract=This ethnographic study examined how a group of high altitude climbers (N = 6) drew on ethnomethodological principles (the documentary method of interpretation, reflexivity, indexicality, and membership) to interpret their experiences of cognitive dissonance during an attempt to scale Mt. Everest. Data were collected via participant observation, interviews, and a field diary. Each data source was subjected to a content mode of analysis. Results revealed how cognitive dissonance reduction is accomplished from within the interaction between a pattern of self-justification and self-inconsistencies; how the reflexive nature of cognitive dissonance is experienced; how specific features of the setting are inextricably linked to the cognitive dissonance experience; and how climbers draw upon a shared stock of knowledge in their experiences with cognitive dissonance. | |Abstract=This ethnographic study examined how a group of high altitude climbers (N = 6) drew on ethnomethodological principles (the documentary method of interpretation, reflexivity, indexicality, and membership) to interpret their experiences of cognitive dissonance during an attempt to scale Mt. Everest. Data were collected via participant observation, interviews, and a field diary. Each data source was subjected to a content mode of analysis. Results revealed how cognitive dissonance reduction is accomplished from within the interaction between a pattern of self-justification and self-inconsistencies; how the reflexive nature of cognitive dissonance is experienced; how specific features of the setting are inextricably linked to the cognitive dissonance experience; and how climbers draw upon a shared stock of knowledge in their experiences with cognitive dissonance. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:26, 21 November 2019
| Burke2008 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Burke2008 |
| Author(s) | Shaunna Burke, Andrew C. Sparkes, Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson |
| Title | High altitude climbers as ethnomethodologists making sense of cognitive dissonance: ethnographic insights from an attempt to scale Mt. Everest |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Ethnomethodology, High Altitude Climbers, Cognitive Dissonance |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2008 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sport Psychologist |
| Volume | 22 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 336–355 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1123/tsp.22.3.336 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This ethnographic study examined how a group of high altitude climbers (N = 6) drew on ethnomethodological principles (the documentary method of interpretation, reflexivity, indexicality, and membership) to interpret their experiences of cognitive dissonance during an attempt to scale Mt. Everest. Data were collected via participant observation, interviews, and a field diary. Each data source was subjected to a content mode of analysis. Results revealed how cognitive dissonance reduction is accomplished from within the interaction between a pattern of self-justification and self-inconsistencies; how the reflexive nature of cognitive dissonance is experienced; how specific features of the setting are inextricably linked to the cognitive dissonance experience; and how climbers draw upon a shared stock of knowledge in their experiences with cognitive dissonance.
Notes
