Difference between revisions of "Laurier2007"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Eric Laurier; Chris Philo |Title="A parcel of muddling muckworms": Revisiting Habermas and the English coffee house |Tag(s)=EMCA; Cafes;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Eric Laurier; Chris Philo | |Author(s)=Eric Laurier; Chris Philo | ||
− | |Title= | + | |Title=“A parcel of muddling muckworms”: revisiting Habermas and the English coffee house |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Cafes; Habermas; Public Space; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Cafes; Habermas; Public Space; |
|Key=Laurier2007 | |Key=Laurier2007 | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=8 | |Volume=8 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=259–281 |
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649360701360212 | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649360701360212 | ||
− | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1080/14649360701360212 |
|Abstract=In the context of a research project concerned with contemporary cafés, the authors have revisited Habermas's famous 1962/1989 work on the transformation of the ‘public sphere’, wherein the figure of the early-modern English coffee-house holds considerable significance. The outlines of Habermas's claims are inspected, and three lines of critique—to do with spatiality, sociability and practices—are held up against his depiction of coffee-houses as contained and egalitarian spaces of calm rational-critical debate. Theoretical work is combined with a re-reading of Habermas's fragmentary notes on the coffee-house, together with borrowings from both secondary texts and republished primary sources. The chief aim is to develop critical materials to inform further inquiry into coffee-houses and similar establishments, past and present, as sites for the practical conduct of public life. | |Abstract=In the context of a research project concerned with contemporary cafés, the authors have revisited Habermas's famous 1962/1989 work on the transformation of the ‘public sphere’, wherein the figure of the early-modern English coffee-house holds considerable significance. The outlines of Habermas's claims are inspected, and three lines of critique—to do with spatiality, sociability and practices—are held up against his depiction of coffee-houses as contained and egalitarian spaces of calm rational-critical debate. Theoretical work is combined with a re-reading of Habermas's fragmentary notes on the coffee-house, together with borrowings from both secondary texts and republished primary sources. The chief aim is to develop critical materials to inform further inquiry into coffee-houses and similar establishments, past and present, as sites for the practical conduct of public life. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 12:41, 18 November 2019
Laurier2007 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Laurier2007 |
Author(s) | Eric Laurier, Chris Philo |
Title | “A parcel of muddling muckworms”: revisiting Habermas and the English coffee house |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Cafes, Habermas, Public Space |
Publisher | |
Year | 2007 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Social and Cultural Geography |
Volume | 8 |
Number | 2 |
Pages | 259–281 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1080/14649360701360212 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In the context of a research project concerned with contemporary cafés, the authors have revisited Habermas's famous 1962/1989 work on the transformation of the ‘public sphere’, wherein the figure of the early-modern English coffee-house holds considerable significance. The outlines of Habermas's claims are inspected, and three lines of critique—to do with spatiality, sociability and practices—are held up against his depiction of coffee-houses as contained and egalitarian spaces of calm rational-critical debate. Theoretical work is combined with a re-reading of Habermas's fragmentary notes on the coffee-house, together with borrowings from both secondary texts and republished primary sources. The chief aim is to develop critical materials to inform further inquiry into coffee-houses and similar establishments, past and present, as sites for the practical conduct of public life.
Notes