Difference between revisions of "May2007"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marian May |Title=Troubled conception: Negotiating the likelihood of having children |Editor(s)=J. Rendle-Short; M. Nevile |Tag(s)=EMCA;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Marian May | |Author(s)=Marian May | ||
| − | |Title=Troubled conception: | + | |Title=Troubled conception: negotiating the likelihood of having children |
| − | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Family; Children; Negotiations; Conversation Analysis; delicates | |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Family; Children; Negotiations; Conversation Analysis; | ||
|Key=May2007 | |Key=May2007 | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=30 | |Volume=30 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| + | |Pages=32.1–32.19 | ||
|URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0732 | |URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.2104/aral0732 | ||
|DOI=10.2104/aral0732 | |DOI=10.2104/aral0732 | ||
| − | |||
|Abstract=In the context of low fertility and Australia’s ageing population, a national longitudinal telephone survey, Negotiating the Life Course (NLC), asks women about their childbearing intentions. This paper uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine interaction between an interviewer and respondents on one NLC question about the likelihood of having children, Question 165. The analysis focuses on excerpts from troubled interviews, making transparent the task of negotiating responses acceptable to the interviewer and shedding light on problems inherent in the question for older women and women for whom prediction is difficult. Analysis shows the trouble to result from lack of congruence in the purposes of the researcher and the respondent: the researcher asks about likelihood, whereas the respondent tells her own story. | |Abstract=In the context of low fertility and Australia’s ageing population, a national longitudinal telephone survey, Negotiating the Life Course (NLC), asks women about their childbearing intentions. This paper uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine interaction between an interviewer and respondents on one NLC question about the likelihood of having children, Question 165. The analysis focuses on excerpts from troubled interviews, making transparent the task of negotiating responses acceptable to the interviewer and shedding light on problems inherent in the question for older women and women for whom prediction is difficult. Analysis shows the trouble to result from lack of congruence in the purposes of the researcher and the respondent: the researcher asks about likelihood, whereas the respondent tells her own story. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:16, 18 November 2019
| May2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | May2007 |
| Author(s) | Marian May |
| Title | Troubled conception: negotiating the likelihood of having children |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Family, Children, Negotiations, Conversation Analysis, delicates |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Australian Review of Applied Linguistics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 32.1–32.19 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.2104/aral0732 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In the context of low fertility and Australia’s ageing population, a national longitudinal telephone survey, Negotiating the Life Course (NLC), asks women about their childbearing intentions. This paper uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine interaction between an interviewer and respondents on one NLC question about the likelihood of having children, Question 165. The analysis focuses on excerpts from troubled interviews, making transparent the task of negotiating responses acceptable to the interviewer and shedding light on problems inherent in the question for older women and women for whom prediction is difficult. Analysis shows the trouble to result from lack of congruence in the purposes of the researcher and the respondent: the researcher asks about likelihood, whereas the respondent tells her own story.
Notes
