Difference between revisions of "Ruusuvuori2007"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Johanna Ruusuvuori; |Title=Managing affect: integration of empathy and problem-solving in health care encounters |Tag(s)=EMCA; Healthcar...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=9 | |Volume=9 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=5 |
| + | |Pages=597–622 | ||
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445607081269 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1461445607081269 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445607081269 | ||
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=This study describes the ways in which professionals in two contexts of health care: general practice and homeopathic consultations, respond to patients' affective expressions of a trouble or a problem. The focus is on the turns of professionals that display understanding, compassion or agreement with the patient's account. Different types of affiliative turns are described and their consequences for the following interaction are scrutinized in relation to the institutional task of solving the patients' health-related problems. It is shown that in both contexts, affiliation is oriented to as working towards closing the sequence of troubles-telling and serves to shift back to problem-solving activity, whilst in homeopathy, it may also serve as a means to problem-solving and thus help to complete the institutional task at hand. Some implications of these observations for professional—client interaction will be described. To conclude, the role of emotion in institutional interaction will also be discussed. |
| − | contexts of | ||
| − | respond to | ||
| − | is on the turns of | ||
| − | agreement with the | ||
| − | described and their consequences for the following interaction are scrutinized | ||
| − | in relation to the institutional task of | ||
| − | problems. It is shown that in both contexts, affiliation is oriented to as | ||
| − | working towards closing the sequence of | ||
| − | back to problem-solving activity, whilst in homeopathy, it may also serve as | ||
| − | a means to problem-solving and thus help to complete the institutional task | ||
| − | at hand. Some implications of | ||
| − | interaction will be described. To conclude, the role of | ||
| − | interaction will also be discussed. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:05, 17 November 2019
| Ruusuvuori2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ruusuvuori2007 |
| Author(s) | Johanna Ruusuvuori |
| Title | Managing affect: integration of empathy and problem-solving in health care encounters |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Healthcare communication, affect, empathy, conversation analysis, institutional interaction, general practice, homeopathy |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 597–622 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445607081269 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study describes the ways in which professionals in two contexts of health care: general practice and homeopathic consultations, respond to patients' affective expressions of a trouble or a problem. The focus is on the turns of professionals that display understanding, compassion or agreement with the patient's account. Different types of affiliative turns are described and their consequences for the following interaction are scrutinized in relation to the institutional task of solving the patients' health-related problems. It is shown that in both contexts, affiliation is oriented to as working towards closing the sequence of troubles-telling and serves to shift back to problem-solving activity, whilst in homeopathy, it may also serve as a means to problem-solving and thus help to complete the institutional task at hand. Some implications of these observations for professional—client interaction will be described. To conclude, the role of emotion in institutional interaction will also be discussed.
Notes
