Difference between revisions of "Vincent-etal2007"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Diane Vincent; Marty Laforest; Annie Bergeron; |Title=Lies, rebukes and social norms: on the unspeakable in interactions with health-car...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=9 | |Volume=9 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=226–245 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445607075349 |
| + | |DOI=10.1177/1461445607075349 | ||
|Abstract=Reflecting upon the lies that are tied to rebukes is a fundamental step in the analysis of interactions between health-care professionals and their clients. Our research focuses on questions that incite people to lie, namely, those for which a lying response avoids a rebuke or a judgment based on some type of behaviour. Our objectives are: 1) to characterize the `question/response' exchange that is interpreted as a `potential rebuke/ lie' exchange, and the questions that may induce lying; 2) to identify the strategies that health-care professionals implement in order to obtain the information they seek when questioning their clients; and 3) to identify themes that refer to behavioural norms that clients might be inclined to lie about. The results are based on the assumption that there are ties between behaviour and speech acts, in this case between the transgression of behavioural norms and lying. | |Abstract=Reflecting upon the lies that are tied to rebukes is a fundamental step in the analysis of interactions between health-care professionals and their clients. Our research focuses on questions that incite people to lie, namely, those for which a lying response avoids a rebuke or a judgment based on some type of behaviour. Our objectives are: 1) to characterize the `question/response' exchange that is interpreted as a `potential rebuke/ lie' exchange, and the questions that may induce lying; 2) to identify the strategies that health-care professionals implement in order to obtain the information they seek when questioning their clients; and 3) to identify themes that refer to behavioural norms that clients might be inclined to lie about. The results are based on the assumption that there are ties between behaviour and speech acts, in this case between the transgression of behavioural norms and lying. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:29, 17 November 2019
| Vincent-etal2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Vincent-etal2007 |
| Author(s) | Diane Vincent, Marty Laforest, Annie Bergeron |
| Title | Lies, rebukes and social norms: on the unspeakable in interactions with health-care professionals |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, behavioural norms, health-care professional/client interaction, language at work, lying |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 226–245 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445607075349 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Reflecting upon the lies that are tied to rebukes is a fundamental step in the analysis of interactions between health-care professionals and their clients. Our research focuses on questions that incite people to lie, namely, those for which a lying response avoids a rebuke or a judgment based on some type of behaviour. Our objectives are: 1) to characterize the `question/response' exchange that is interpreted as a `potential rebuke/ lie' exchange, and the questions that may induce lying; 2) to identify the strategies that health-care professionals implement in order to obtain the information they seek when questioning their clients; and 3) to identify themes that refer to behavioural norms that clients might be inclined to lie about. The results are based on the assumption that there are ties between behaviour and speech acts, in this case between the transgression of behavioural norms and lying.
Notes
