Difference between revisions of "Wilkinson-Kitzinger2007"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Sue Wilkinson; Celia Kitzinger; |Title=Conversation analysis, gender and sexuality |Editor(s)=Ann Weatherall; Bernadette Watson; Ci...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Booktitle=Language, Discourse and Social Psychology | |Booktitle=Language, Discourse and Social Psychology | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=206–230 |
| + | |URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230206168_9 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1057/9780230206168_9 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This chapter explores the use of conversation analysis in studying gender and sexuality from a feminist perspective. We are both long-time feminist researchers and activists (see, for example, Kitzinger, 1987, 2004; Kitzinger & Wilkinson, 2004; Wilkinson 1986, 2007; Wilkinson & Kitzinger, 1993). Feminism means developing an understanding of oppression on the basis of gender and sexuality and acting to end it. Oppression operates at many levels – from rape, physical violence and intimidation (Amnesty International, 2001), through discriminatory legislation and institutional practices (Wilkinson & Kitzinger, 2006), to beauty practices (Jeffreys, 2005), offensive joking, banter and innuendo (Hall & Bucholtz, 1995). In our current research, we focus on mundane, routine, everyday forms of oppression: the ‘micro-inequalities’ of social life (Haslett & Lipman, 1997). We are committed to understanding how sexist and heterosexist presumptions are threaded through the ordinary practices of talk and interaction that, cumulatively, constitute an oppressive social order. Conversation analysis offers a powerful and rigorous method for exposing the mundane oppressions of everyday life. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:16, 17 November 2019
| Wilkinson-Kitzinger2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Wilkinson-Kitzinger2007 |
| Author(s) | Sue Wilkinson, Celia Kitzinger |
| Title | Conversation analysis, gender and sexuality |
| Editor(s) | Ann Weatherall, Bernadette Watson, Cindy Gallois |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | Palgrave MacMillan |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 206–230 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1057/9780230206168_9 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Language, Discourse and Social Psychology |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This chapter explores the use of conversation analysis in studying gender and sexuality from a feminist perspective. We are both long-time feminist researchers and activists (see, for example, Kitzinger, 1987, 2004; Kitzinger & Wilkinson, 2004; Wilkinson 1986, 2007; Wilkinson & Kitzinger, 1993). Feminism means developing an understanding of oppression on the basis of gender and sexuality and acting to end it. Oppression operates at many levels – from rape, physical violence and intimidation (Amnesty International, 2001), through discriminatory legislation and institutional practices (Wilkinson & Kitzinger, 2006), to beauty practices (Jeffreys, 2005), offensive joking, banter and innuendo (Hall & Bucholtz, 1995). In our current research, we focus on mundane, routine, everyday forms of oppression: the ‘micro-inequalities’ of social life (Haslett & Lipman, 1997). We are committed to understanding how sexist and heterosexist presumptions are threaded through the ordinary practices of talk and interaction that, cumulatively, constitute an oppressive social order. Conversation analysis offers a powerful and rigorous method for exposing the mundane oppressions of everyday life.
Notes
