Difference between revisions of "Neyland2006"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Daniel Neyland |Title=The Accomplishment of Spatial Adequacy: Analysing CCTV Accounts of British Town Centres |Tag(s)=EMCA; CCTV; |Key=...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Daniel Neyland
 
|Author(s)=Daniel Neyland
|Title=The Accomplishment of Spatial Adequacy: Analysing CCTV Accounts of British Town Centres
+
|Title=The accomplishment of spatial adequacy: analysing CCTV accounts of British town centres
|Tag(s)=EMCA; CCTV;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; CCTV;
 
|Key=Neyland2006
 
|Key=Neyland2006
 
|Year=2006
 
|Year=2006
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
 
|Pages=599–613
 
|Pages=599–613
|URL=http://epd.sagepub.com/content/24/4/599
+
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/d384t
 
|DOI=10.1068/d384t
 
|DOI=10.1068/d384t
 
|Abstract=The number of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in British town centres has rapidly increased in recent years. These increases are mirrored in Europe and North America. In Britain many of these cameras videotape town centres, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. How do CCTV systems account for the space of the town centres in which they operate? What theoretical sensibilities can we use to engage with CCTV spatial accounting? To what extent do terms such as ‘professional,’ ‘legal’, ‘sociotechnical’, and ‘mundane’ enable adequate renditions of spatial-accounting activity? In this paper I will argue that engagement with the accomplishment of mundane public flows and specific incidents of accountable otherness can initiate a discussion of these questions and initiate an alternative to panoptic renditions of CCTV. The discussion will seek to draw together a potentially tense and disruptive theoretical combination of ethnomethodology and science and technology studies.
 
|Abstract=The number of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in British town centres has rapidly increased in recent years. These increases are mirrored in Europe and North America. In Britain many of these cameras videotape town centres, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. How do CCTV systems account for the space of the town centres in which they operate? What theoretical sensibilities can we use to engage with CCTV spatial accounting? To what extent do terms such as ‘professional,’ ‘legal’, ‘sociotechnical’, and ‘mundane’ enable adequate renditions of spatial-accounting activity? In this paper I will argue that engagement with the accomplishment of mundane public flows and specific incidents of accountable otherness can initiate a discussion of these questions and initiate an alternative to panoptic renditions of CCTV. The discussion will seek to draw together a potentially tense and disruptive theoretical combination of ethnomethodology and science and technology studies.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:32, 13 November 2019

Neyland2006
BibType ARTICLE
Key Neyland2006
Author(s) Daniel Neyland
Title The accomplishment of spatial adequacy: analysing CCTV accounts of British town centres
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, CCTV
Publisher
Year 2006
Language
City
Month
Journal Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Volume 24
Number 4
Pages 599–613
URL Link
DOI 10.1068/d384t
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The number of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras in British town centres has rapidly increased in recent years. These increases are mirrored in Europe and North America. In Britain many of these cameras videotape town centres, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. How do CCTV systems account for the space of the town centres in which they operate? What theoretical sensibilities can we use to engage with CCTV spatial accounting? To what extent do terms such as ‘professional,’ ‘legal’, ‘sociotechnical’, and ‘mundane’ enable adequate renditions of spatial-accounting activity? In this paper I will argue that engagement with the accomplishment of mundane public flows and specific incidents of accountable otherness can initiate a discussion of these questions and initiate an alternative to panoptic renditions of CCTV. The discussion will seek to draw together a potentially tense and disruptive theoretical combination of ethnomethodology and science and technology studies.

Notes