Difference between revisions of "Wouk2005"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Fay Wouk |Title=The Syntax of Repair in Indonesian |Tag(s)=EMCA; Indonesian; projectability; same turn self-repair; syntactic constituen...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Fay Wouk | |Author(s)=Fay Wouk | ||
| − | |Title=The | + | |Title=The syntax of repair in Indonesian |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Indonesian; projectability; same turn self-repair; syntactic constituency | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Indonesian; projectability; same turn self-repair; syntactic constituency | ||
|Key=Wouk2005 | |Key=Wouk2005 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=237–258 | |Pages=237–258 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445605050368 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445605050368 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445605050368 | ||
|Abstract=This study looks at the syntax of conversational same turn self-repair (STSR) in Indonesian. STSR is the process by which speakers make alterations to the turn in progress. Patterns of repetition in STSR allow us to determine which syntactic categories speakers make use of in organizing self-repair. Previously observed cross-linguistic variation in this area has been explained in terms of projectability. The majority of Indonesian repairs prove to be limited in scope to a single word or a single immediate constituent. However, larger scope recycling involving constituents such as clause and verb phrase do occur. Indonesian findings are compared with those of previously published studies of other languages. The results support an interpretation in terms of projectability. | |Abstract=This study looks at the syntax of conversational same turn self-repair (STSR) in Indonesian. STSR is the process by which speakers make alterations to the turn in progress. Patterns of repetition in STSR allow us to determine which syntactic categories speakers make use of in organizing self-repair. Previously observed cross-linguistic variation in this area has been explained in terms of projectability. The majority of Indonesian repairs prove to be limited in scope to a single word or a single immediate constituent. However, larger scope recycling involving constituents such as clause and verb phrase do occur. Indonesian findings are compared with those of previously published studies of other languages. The results support an interpretation in terms of projectability. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:46, 2 November 2019
| Wouk2005 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wouk2005 |
| Author(s) | Fay Wouk |
| Title | The syntax of repair in Indonesian |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Indonesian, projectability, same turn self-repair, syntactic constituency |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2005 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 237–258 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445605050368 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study looks at the syntax of conversational same turn self-repair (STSR) in Indonesian. STSR is the process by which speakers make alterations to the turn in progress. Patterns of repetition in STSR allow us to determine which syntactic categories speakers make use of in organizing self-repair. Previously observed cross-linguistic variation in this area has been explained in terms of projectability. The majority of Indonesian repairs prove to be limited in scope to a single word or a single immediate constituent. However, larger scope recycling involving constituents such as clause and verb phrase do occur. Indonesian findings are compared with those of previously published studies of other languages. The results support an interpretation in terms of projectability.
Notes
