Difference between revisions of "Helasvuo2004"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marja-Liisa Helasvuo |Title=Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-constructions |Tag(s)=conversation analysis; shared syntax; co-construction...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Marja-Liisa Helasvuo | |Author(s)=Marja-Liisa Helasvuo | ||
− | |Title=Shared | + | |Title=Shared syntax: the grammar of co-constructions |
|Tag(s)=conversation analysis; shared syntax; co-construction; Finnish; compound TCUs; sentences-in-progress | |Tag(s)=conversation analysis; shared syntax; co-construction; Finnish; compound TCUs; sentences-in-progress | ||
|Key=Helasvuo2004 | |Key=Helasvuo2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
− | | | + | |Volume=38 |
− | | | + | |Number=8 |
− | | | + | |Pages=1315–1336 |
− | | | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216604001134 |
− | | | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007 |
|Abstract=This paper focuses on co-constructions, i.e., clauses that are produced collaboratively by the conversation participants (see Sacks, 1992: 647–655; Lerner, 1991, 1994, 1996; Ono and Thompson, 1996). More specifically, the paper looks at completions that involve the co-construction of one clause. The data for the study come from Finnish, and offer an interesting perspective on the phenomenon, as Finnish is a language with rich inflectional morphology. Each item in the clause is inflected in a form that shows its function in the clause. This means that in a completion, the form of each item in both the preliminary and final part is controlled by the emerging unit as a whole. Completions are shown to occur at different syntactic levels, both at constituent boundaries and also within constituents (e.g., within a noun phrase) and even within lexical units. The conclusion is that syntax is shared and jointly produced, from the smallest units up to larger sequences. | |Abstract=This paper focuses on co-constructions, i.e., clauses that are produced collaboratively by the conversation participants (see Sacks, 1992: 647–655; Lerner, 1991, 1994, 1996; Ono and Thompson, 1996). More specifically, the paper looks at completions that involve the co-construction of one clause. The data for the study come from Finnish, and offer an interesting perspective on the phenomenon, as Finnish is a language with rich inflectional morphology. Each item in the clause is inflected in a form that shows its function in the clause. This means that in a completion, the form of each item in both the preliminary and final part is controlled by the emerging unit as a whole. Completions are shown to occur at different syntactic levels, both at constituent boundaries and also within constituents (e.g., within a noun phrase) and even within lexical units. The conclusion is that syntax is shared and jointly produced, from the smallest units up to larger sequences. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:36, 1 November 2019
Helasvuo2004 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Helasvuo2004 |
Author(s) | Marja-Liisa Helasvuo |
Title | Shared syntax: the grammar of co-constructions |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | conversation analysis, shared syntax, co-construction, Finnish, compound TCUs, sentences-in-progress |
Publisher | |
Year | 2004 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 38 |
Number | 8 |
Pages | 1315–1336 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper focuses on co-constructions, i.e., clauses that are produced collaboratively by the conversation participants (see Sacks, 1992: 647–655; Lerner, 1991, 1994, 1996; Ono and Thompson, 1996). More specifically, the paper looks at completions that involve the co-construction of one clause. The data for the study come from Finnish, and offer an interesting perspective on the phenomenon, as Finnish is a language with rich inflectional morphology. Each item in the clause is inflected in a form that shows its function in the clause. This means that in a completion, the form of each item in both the preliminary and final part is controlled by the emerging unit as a whole. Completions are shown to occur at different syntactic levels, both at constituent boundaries and also within constituents (e.g., within a noun phrase) and even within lexical units. The conclusion is that syntax is shared and jointly produced, from the smallest units up to larger sequences.
Notes