Difference between revisions of "Wowk2004"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Maria T. Wowk; Andrew Carlin; |Title=Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorizat...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Maria T. Wowk; Andrew Carlin; | + | |Author(s)=Maria T. Wowk; Andrew Carlin; |
| − | |Title=Depicting a | + | |Title=Depicting a liminal position in ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis: the work of Rod Watson |
| − | |Tag(s)=Membership Categorization Analysis; EMCA; Institutional talk; Ethnomethodology; Public Space; | + | |Tag(s)=Membership Categorization Analysis; EMCA; Institutional talk; Ethnomethodology; Public Space; |
|Key=Wowk2004 | |Key=Wowk2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=27 | |Volume=27 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=69–89 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FB%3AHUMA.0000012245.95451.4b |
| + | |DOI=10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012245.95451.4b | ||
|Abstract=This paper provides a provisional examination of Rod Watson's work and contributions to EM/CA/MCA, in part through a critique of misrepresentations of his arguments in secondary accounts of his work. The form of these misrepresentations includes adumbration and traducement of his arguments. Focusing on the reflexivity of category and sequence and turn-generated categories, we suggest that his analytic position within ethnomethodological fields is unique and remarkable, yet largely unacknowledged. We argue that a re-examination of the body of Watson's work makes relevant explicit and appropriate acknowledgement of his contributions through his “unconventional” approach and his extension of prior works in novel and stimulating directions. | |Abstract=This paper provides a provisional examination of Rod Watson's work and contributions to EM/CA/MCA, in part through a critique of misrepresentations of his arguments in secondary accounts of his work. The form of these misrepresentations includes adumbration and traducement of his arguments. Focusing on the reflexivity of category and sequence and turn-generated categories, we suggest that his analytic position within ethnomethodological fields is unique and remarkable, yet largely unacknowledged. We argue that a re-examination of the body of Watson's work makes relevant explicit and appropriate acknowledgement of his contributions through his “unconventional” approach and his extension of prior works in novel and stimulating directions. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:36, 31 October 2019
| Wowk2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wowk2004 |
| Author(s) | Maria T. Wowk, Andrew Carlin |
| Title | Depicting a liminal position in ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis: the work of Rod Watson |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Membership Categorization Analysis, EMCA, Institutional talk, Ethnomethodology, Public Space |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 27 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 69–89 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012245.95451.4b |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper provides a provisional examination of Rod Watson's work and contributions to EM/CA/MCA, in part through a critique of misrepresentations of his arguments in secondary accounts of his work. The form of these misrepresentations includes adumbration and traducement of his arguments. Focusing on the reflexivity of category and sequence and turn-generated categories, we suggest that his analytic position within ethnomethodological fields is unique and remarkable, yet largely unacknowledged. We argue that a re-examination of the body of Watson's work makes relevant explicit and appropriate acknowledgement of his contributions through his “unconventional” approach and his extension of prior works in novel and stimulating directions.
Notes
