Difference between revisions of "Stubbe-etal2003"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Maria Stubbe; Chris Lane; Jo Hilder; Elaine Vine; Bernadette Vine; Meredith Marra; Janet Holmes; Ann Weatherall; |Title=Multiple Discour...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=5 | |Volume=5 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=351–388 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614456030053004 |
| + | |DOI=10.1177/14614456030053004 | ||
|Abstract=This article explores the contributions that five different approaches to discourse analysis can make to interpreting and understanding the same piece of data. Conversation analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, politeness theory, critical discourse analysis, and discursive psychology are the approaches chosen for comparison. The data is a nine-minute audio recording of a spontaneous workplace interaction. The analyses are compared, and the theoretical and methodological implications of the different approaches are discussed. | |Abstract=This article explores the contributions that five different approaches to discourse analysis can make to interpreting and understanding the same piece of data. Conversation analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, politeness theory, critical discourse analysis, and discursive psychology are the approaches chosen for comparison. The data is a nine-minute audio recording of a spontaneous workplace interaction. The analyses are compared, and the theoretical and methodological implications of the different approaches are discussed. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:34, 31 October 2019
| Stubbe-etal2003 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stubbe-etal2003 |
| Author(s) | Maria Stubbe, Chris Lane, Jo Hilder, Elaine Vine, Bernadette Vine, Meredith Marra, Janet Holmes, Ann Weatherall |
| Title | Multiple Discourse Analyses of a Workplace Interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, critical discourse analysis, discourse analysis, discursive psychology, interactional sociolinguistics, politeness theory, pragmatics, workplace interaction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2003 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 351–388 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614456030053004 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article explores the contributions that five different approaches to discourse analysis can make to interpreting and understanding the same piece of data. Conversation analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, politeness theory, critical discourse analysis, and discursive psychology are the approaches chosen for comparison. The data is a nine-minute audio recording of a spontaneous workplace interaction. The analyses are compared, and the theoretical and methodological implications of the different approaches are discussed.
Notes
