Difference between revisions of "West2002"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0957926502013004455 | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0957926502013004455 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/0957926502013004455 | |DOI=10.1177/0957926502013004455 | ||
| − | |Abstract=In this article, we analyze the proceedings of a meeting that terminated affirmative action policies at the University of California. Employing our recent theoretical reformulation of difference as an accomplishment, we explore participants' means of doing gender, race and class in these deliberations. In discussing our findings, we call attention to their relevance for | + | |Abstract=In this article, we analyze the proceedings of a meeting that terminated affirmative action policies at the University of California. Employing our recent theoretical reformulation of difference as an accomplishment, we explore participants' means of doing gender, race and class in these deliberations. In discussing our findings, we call attention to their relevance for 'formal' and critical discourse analysis. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:53, 29 October 2019
| West2002 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | West2002 |
| Author(s) | Candace West, Sarah Fenstermaker |
| Title | Accountability in action: the accomplishment of gender, race and class in a meeting of the University of California Board of Regents |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, gender, race, class |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Society |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 537–563 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0957926502013004455 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this article, we analyze the proceedings of a meeting that terminated affirmative action policies at the University of California. Employing our recent theoretical reformulation of difference as an accomplishment, we explore participants' means of doing gender, race and class in these deliberations. In discussing our findings, we call attention to their relevance for 'formal' and critical discourse analysis.
Notes
