Difference between revisions of "Beach2000"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; | |Author(s)=Wayne A. Beach; | ||
|Title=Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman | |Title=Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Storytelling; Gossip; Morality; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Storytelling; Gossip; Morality; invitation sequences; prosody; vernacular performances; sexism; |
|Key=Beach2000 | |Key=Beach2000 | ||
|Year=2000 | |Year=2000 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=29 | |Volume=29 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=379–407 | |Pages=379–407 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/inviting-collaborations-in-stories-about-a-woman/C59F7847F0C3B15A11156D78BB8AE46C |
| + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500003031 | ||
|Abstract=Stories provide rich environments for understanding how invitations to action, and responses to them, are delicately managed and consequential for shaping just how “the story” evolves as a form of social organization. The present analysis focuses on SEVENTEEN INVITED COLLABORATIONS, as “Two guys” co-author gossip about an absent woman, and on the distinct interactional dilemmas that arise as morally indignant references are occasioned, initially avoided, and yet gradually pursued as resources for escalating affiliation and intimacy. At noticeably risky moments, as the story gets reconfigured – from a reporting about “last night,” to sexualized fantasy enacted through stereotypic portrayals of uneducated Southern males – speakers' intoned and animated VOICES are revealed as methodically deployed, prosodically constructed, and increasingly choral practices for shaping story trajectories: artfully crafted resources for contextualizing and negotiating concerted actions in ordinary conversation. The analysis concludes by addressing the question: Are these gossiping actions “sexist”? | |Abstract=Stories provide rich environments for understanding how invitations to action, and responses to them, are delicately managed and consequential for shaping just how “the story” evolves as a form of social organization. The present analysis focuses on SEVENTEEN INVITED COLLABORATIONS, as “Two guys” co-author gossip about an absent woman, and on the distinct interactional dilemmas that arise as morally indignant references are occasioned, initially avoided, and yet gradually pursued as resources for escalating affiliation and intimacy. At noticeably risky moments, as the story gets reconfigured – from a reporting about “last night,” to sexualized fantasy enacted through stereotypic portrayals of uneducated Southern males – speakers' intoned and animated VOICES are revealed as methodically deployed, prosodically constructed, and increasingly choral practices for shaping story trajectories: artfully crafted resources for contextualizing and negotiating concerted actions in ordinary conversation. The analysis concludes by addressing the question: Are these gossiping actions “sexist”? | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:11, 27 October 2019
| Beach2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Beach2000 |
| Author(s) | Wayne A. Beach |
| Title | Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Storytelling, Gossip, Morality, invitation sequences, prosody, vernacular performances, sexism |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 29 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 379–407 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500003031 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Stories provide rich environments for understanding how invitations to action, and responses to them, are delicately managed and consequential for shaping just how “the story” evolves as a form of social organization. The present analysis focuses on SEVENTEEN INVITED COLLABORATIONS, as “Two guys” co-author gossip about an absent woman, and on the distinct interactional dilemmas that arise as morally indignant references are occasioned, initially avoided, and yet gradually pursued as resources for escalating affiliation and intimacy. At noticeably risky moments, as the story gets reconfigured – from a reporting about “last night,” to sexualized fantasy enacted through stereotypic portrayals of uneducated Southern males – speakers' intoned and animated VOICES are revealed as methodically deployed, prosodically constructed, and increasingly choral practices for shaping story trajectories: artfully crafted resources for contextualizing and negotiating concerted actions in ordinary conversation. The analysis concludes by addressing the question: Are these gossiping actions “sexist”?
Notes
