Difference between revisions of "Nelson1994"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christian Kjaer Nelson |Title=Ethnomethodological positions on the use of ethnographic data in conversation analytic research |Tag(s)=EM...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Christian Kjaer Nelson | |Author(s)=Christian Kjaer Nelson | ||
|Title=Ethnomethodological positions on the use of ethnographic data in conversation analytic research | |Title=Ethnomethodological positions on the use of ethnographic data in conversation analytic research | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Ethnography; Conversation Analysis; Research Methods; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Ethnography; Conversation Analysis; Research Methods; |
|Key=Nelson1994 | |Key=Nelson1994 | ||
|Year=1994 | |Year=1994 | ||
|Journal=Journal of Contemporary Ethnography | |Journal=Journal of Contemporary Ethnography | ||
|Volume=23 | |Volume=23 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| + | |Pages=307–329 | ||
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/089124194023003003 | |URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/089124194023003003 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1177/089124194023003003 | ||
|Abstract=This article presents explicit ethnomethodological positions on the acceptability and/or desirability of using ethnographic data, variously conceived, with conversation analytic discourse data to carry out conversation analytic studies. Besides aiming to prompt thought about the different types of ethnographic data and their worth to certain social scientific objectives, this review also seeks to suggest why continuing ethnomethodological discussions regarding the use of ethnographic data might prove worthwhile to those trying to further their understanding of ethnomethodology. | |Abstract=This article presents explicit ethnomethodological positions on the acceptability and/or desirability of using ethnographic data, variously conceived, with conversation analytic discourse data to carry out conversation analytic studies. Besides aiming to prompt thought about the different types of ethnographic data and their worth to certain social scientific objectives, this review also seeks to suggest why continuing ethnomethodological discussions regarding the use of ethnographic data might prove worthwhile to those trying to further their understanding of ethnomethodology. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:24, 24 October 2019
| Nelson1994 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Nelson1994 |
| Author(s) | Christian Kjaer Nelson |
| Title | Ethnomethodological positions on the use of ethnographic data in conversation analytic research |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Ethnography, Conversation Analysis, Research Methods |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1994 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Contemporary Ethnography |
| Volume | 23 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 307–329 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/089124194023003003 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article presents explicit ethnomethodological positions on the acceptability and/or desirability of using ethnographic data, variously conceived, with conversation analytic discourse data to carry out conversation analytic studies. Besides aiming to prompt thought about the different types of ethnographic data and their worth to certain social scientific objectives, this review also seeks to suggest why continuing ethnomethodological discussions regarding the use of ethnographic data might prove worthwhile to those trying to further their understanding of ethnomethodology.
Notes
