Difference between revisions of "Lynch1993"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=BOOK |Author(s)=Michael Lynch; |Title=Scientific practice and ordinary action: ethnomethodology and social studies of science |Key=Lynch1993 |Publisher=Ca...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=BOOK | |BibType=BOOK | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Michael Lynch; | + | |Author(s)=Michael Lynch; |
| − | |Title=Scientific | + | |Title=Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science |
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Science & Technology Studies; Science; | ||
|Key=Lynch1993 | |Key=Lynch1993 | ||
|Publisher=Cambridge University Press | |Publisher=Cambridge University Press | ||
|Year=1993 | |Year=1993 | ||
|Address=New York | |Address=New York | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/mx/academic/subjects/sociology/sociology-science-and-medicine/scientific-practice-and-ordinary-action-ethnomethodology-and-social-studies-science?format=PB&isbn=9780521597425 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science have grown increasingly interested in the daily practices of scientists. Recent studies have drawn linkages between scientific innovations and more ordinary procedures, craft skills, and sources of sponsorship. These studies dispute the idea that science is the application of a unified method or the outgrowth of a progressive history of ideas. The central purpose of this book is to explore the possibility of an empirical approach to the epistemic contents of science that avoids the pitfalls of scientism and foundationalism. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:10, 23 October 2019
| Lynch1993 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | BOOK |
| Key | Lynch1993 |
| Author(s) | Michael Lynch |
| Title | Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Science & Technology Studies, Science |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Year | 1993 |
| Language | |
| City | New York |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science have grown increasingly interested in the daily practices of scientists. Recent studies have drawn linkages between scientific innovations and more ordinary procedures, craft skills, and sources of sponsorship. These studies dispute the idea that science is the application of a unified method or the outgrowth of a progressive history of ideas. The central purpose of this book is to explore the possibility of an empirical approach to the epistemic contents of science that avoids the pitfalls of scientism and foundationalism.
Notes
