Difference between revisions of "Lerner1991"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/div-classtitleon-the-syntax-of-sentences-in-progressa-hreffn01-ref-typefnadiv/14C4681AB8C86B9AB3E105B23B9655F6 | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/div-classtitleon-the-syntax-of-sentences-in-progressa-hreffn01-ref-typefnadiv/14C4681AB8C86B9AB3E105B23B9655F6 | ||
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404500016572 | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500016572 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This article describes how it could be possible for two participants engaged in conversation to jointly produce a single syntactic unit such as a sentence. From an inspection of sentence types that are achieved through such joint production, it was determined that participants have available a single utterance construction format. This format, the compound turn-constructional unit format, may be a component of a socially construed syntax-for-conversation. It can be constituted by a wide range of interactionally relevant features of talk in interaction that reveal an emerging utterance as a multiple component turn-constructional unit. The compound turn-constructional unit format is primarily a resource for turn-taking. It can be used to project the next proper place for speaker change. However, it concomitantly provides the resources needed to complete the utterance-in-progress of another participant, thus allowing for the construction of a single sentence across the talk of two speakers. | + | |Abstract=This article describes how it could be possible for two participants engaged in conversation to jointly produce a single syntactic unit such as a sentence. From an inspection of sentence types that are achieved through such joint production, it was determined that participants have available a single utterance construction format. This format, the compound turn-constructional unit format, may be a component of a socially construed syntax-for-conversation. It can be constituted by a wide range of interactionally relevant features of talk in interaction that reveal an emerging utterance as a multiple component turn-constructional unit. The compound turn-constructional unit format is primarily a resource for turn-taking. It can be used to project the next proper place for speaker change. However, it concomitantly provides the resources needed to complete the utterance-in-progress of another participant, thus allowing for the construction of a single sentence across the talk of two speakers. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:41, 22 October 2019
| Lerner1991 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Lerner1991 |
| Author(s) | Gene H. Lerner |
| Title | On the syntax of sentences-in-progress |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Syntax, Collaborative completions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1991 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 441–458 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500016572 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article describes how it could be possible for two participants engaged in conversation to jointly produce a single syntactic unit such as a sentence. From an inspection of sentence types that are achieved through such joint production, it was determined that participants have available a single utterance construction format. This format, the compound turn-constructional unit format, may be a component of a socially construed syntax-for-conversation. It can be constituted by a wide range of interactionally relevant features of talk in interaction that reveal an emerging utterance as a multiple component turn-constructional unit. The compound turn-constructional unit format is primarily a resource for turn-taking. It can be used to project the next proper place for speaker change. However, it concomitantly provides the resources needed to complete the utterance-in-progress of another participant, thus allowing for the construction of a single sentence across the talk of two speakers.
Notes
