Difference between revisions of "Button1990b"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Graham Button; |Title=A clash of ideas: A response to Auer |Tag(s)=EMCA; Basic Resources; Conversation Analysis; Closings; |Key=Button...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Graham Button; | + | |Author(s)=Graham Button; |
| − | |Title=A clash of ideas: | + | |Title=A clash of ideas: a response to Auer |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Basic Resources; Conversation Analysis; Closings; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Basic Resources; Conversation Analysis; Closings; |
|Key=Button1990b | |Key=Button1990b | ||
|Year=1990 | |Year=1990 | ||
|Journal=Human Studies | |Journal=Human Studies | ||
|Volume=13 | |Volume=13 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=4 |
| + | |Pages=393–404 | ||
|URL=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00193571 | |URL=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00193571 | ||
|DOI=10.1007/BF00193571 | |DOI=10.1007/BF00193571 | ||
|Abstract=This paper is written as a response to Auer's paper Rhythmic Integration in Phone Closings, at the request of the Editor of Human Studies and with a limitation on the space I may use. Both of these factors have constrained the way in which I have addressed the matter. Ideally I would have examined the details of Auer's materials in some depth. In places I have been able to make reference to them, but in the main I have concentrated on what I believe motivated the editor to request this response which is Auer's attack on Schegloff's and Sacks' (1973) paper, Opening Up Closings, and his glancing blows at conversation analysis in general. | |Abstract=This paper is written as a response to Auer's paper Rhythmic Integration in Phone Closings, at the request of the Editor of Human Studies and with a limitation on the space I may use. Both of these factors have constrained the way in which I have addressed the matter. Ideally I would have examined the details of Auer's materials in some depth. In places I have been able to make reference to them, but in the main I have concentrated on what I believe motivated the editor to request this response which is Auer's attack on Schegloff's and Sacks' (1973) paper, Opening Up Closings, and his glancing blows at conversation analysis in general. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:46, 21 October 2019
| Button1990b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Button1990b |
| Author(s) | Graham Button |
| Title | A clash of ideas: a response to Auer |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Basic Resources, Conversation Analysis, Closings |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1990 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 393–404 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/BF00193571 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper is written as a response to Auer's paper Rhythmic Integration in Phone Closings, at the request of the Editor of Human Studies and with a limitation on the space I may use. Both of these factors have constrained the way in which I have addressed the matter. Ideally I would have examined the details of Auer's materials in some depth. In places I have been able to make reference to them, but in the main I have concentrated on what I believe motivated the editor to request this response which is Auer's attack on Schegloff's and Sacks' (1973) paper, Opening Up Closings, and his glancing blows at conversation analysis in general.
Notes
