Difference between revisions of "Halkowski1990"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Tim Halkowski
+
|Author(s)=Timothy Halkowski
|Title="Role" as as interactional device
+
|Title=“Role” as as interactional device
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Role;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Role;
 
|Key=Halkowski1990
 
|Key=Halkowski1990
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Journal=Social Problems
 
|Journal=Social Problems
 
|Volume=37
 
|Volume=37
|Pages=564-577
+
|Number=4
|URL=http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/socprob37&div=46&id=&page=
+
|Pages=564–577
|Abstract=This paper reports on an aspect of the social organization of interaction, namely, the use by interactants of the concept "role. In contrast with traditional social scientific uses of the concept as an explanatory resource in  
+
|URL=https://academic.oup.com/socpro/article-abstract/37/4/564/2925246
the analysis of social action, I propose that interactants use this concept to make sense of--as  well as accomplish-actions and activities in the social world. Analysis of segments of conversation taken from videotapes of  
+
|DOI=10.2307/800582
the Iran-Contra Congressional hearings demonstrate this as well as the more general point that description is a form of social action.  
+
|Abstract=This paper reports on an aspect of the social organization of interaction, namely, the use by interactants of the concept “role.In contrast with traditional social scientific uses of the concept as an explanatory resource in the analysis of social action, I propose that interactants use this concept to make sense of—as well as accomplish— actions and activities in the social world. Analysis of segments of conversation taken from videotapes of the Iran-Contra Congressional hearings demonstrate this as well as the more general point that description is a form of social action.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 23:32, 21 October 2019

Halkowski1990
BibType ARTICLE
Key Halkowski1990
Author(s) Timothy Halkowski
Title “Role” as as interactional device
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Role
Publisher
Year 1990
Language English
City
Month
Journal Social Problems
Volume 37
Number 4
Pages 564–577
URL Link
DOI 10.2307/800582
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper reports on an aspect of the social organization of interaction, namely, the use by interactants of the concept “role.” In contrast with traditional social scientific uses of the concept as an explanatory resource in the analysis of social action, I propose that interactants use this concept to make sense of—as well as accomplish— actions and activities in the social world. Analysis of segments of conversation taken from videotapes of the Iran-Contra Congressional hearings demonstrate this as well as the more general point that description is a form of social action.

Notes