Difference between revisions of "Bilmes1988"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; |Title=The concept of preference in conversation analysis |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Preference; Methodology; |...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; | + | |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; |
|Title=The concept of preference in conversation analysis | |Title=The concept of preference in conversation analysis | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Preference; Methodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Preference; Methodology; |
|Key=Bilmes1988 | |Key=Bilmes1988 | ||
|Year=1988 | |Year=1988 | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=161–181 |
| − | |DOI= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/concept-of-preference-in-conversation-analysis1/F08D66E6A77DCBBDB232B9A6E06A41F7 |
| + | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500012744 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Preference is treated as a single concept in conversation analysis, but it has in fact developed into an assemblage of loosely related concepts. It has also been construed in a variety of mutually incompatible, and sometimes meth-odologically questionable, ways. This is due, at least in part, to a confusion between preference in its everyday usage and preference as a technical notion. This paper attempts to present a clear and unitary concept of preference and investigate the properties of that concept, differentiate related concepts (including conversational implicature), and reveal common confusions. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:16, 21 October 2019
| Bilmes1988 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bilmes1988 |
| Author(s) | Jack Bilmes |
| Title | The concept of preference in conversation analysis |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Preference, Methodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1988 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 17 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 161–181 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500012744 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Preference is treated as a single concept in conversation analysis, but it has in fact developed into an assemblage of loosely related concepts. It has also been construed in a variety of mutually incompatible, and sometimes meth-odologically questionable, ways. This is due, at least in part, to a confusion between preference in its everyday usage and preference as a technical notion. This paper attempts to present a clear and unitary concept of preference and investigate the properties of that concept, differentiate related concepts (including conversational implicature), and reveal common confusions.
Notes
