Difference between revisions of "Hopper1988"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Robert Hopper; |Title=Speech, for Instance. The Exemplar in Studies of Conversation |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Exemplars; Met...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Robert Hopper; | + | |Author(s)=Robert Hopper; |
| − | |Title=Speech, for Instance | + | |Title=Speech, for Instance: the exemplar in studies of conversation |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Exemplars; Methodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Exemplars; Methodology; |
|Key=Hopper1988 | |Key=Hopper1988 | ||
|Year=1988 | |Year=1988 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=7 | |Volume=7 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=47–63 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261927X8800700104 |
| + | |DOI=10.1177/0261927X8800700104 | ||
|Abstract=This essay considers studies of speech and language that base claims in exemplars by discussing: (1) some classic exemplars used by Austin, Wittgenstein, and others; and (2) exemplars' specifications of message and scene. One exemplist school, conversation analysis, receives emphasis in this treatment, and is contrasted with experimentation in terms of sampling, design, and techniques for analysis. Recommendations for exemplist research include: (1) giving priority to naturally occurring tape-recorded exemplars; (2) employing experimental techniques to extend exemplist research; (3) maintaining openness to innovation and serendipity. | |Abstract=This essay considers studies of speech and language that base claims in exemplars by discussing: (1) some classic exemplars used by Austin, Wittgenstein, and others; and (2) exemplars' specifications of message and scene. One exemplist school, conversation analysis, receives emphasis in this treatment, and is contrasted with experimentation in terms of sampling, design, and techniques for analysis. Recommendations for exemplist research include: (1) giving priority to naturally occurring tape-recorded exemplars; (2) employing experimental techniques to extend exemplist research; (3) maintaining openness to innovation and serendipity. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:01, 21 October 2019
| Hopper1988 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hopper1988 |
| Author(s) | Robert Hopper |
| Title | Speech, for Instance: the exemplar in studies of conversation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Exemplars, Methodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1988 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Language and Social Psychology |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 47–63 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0261927X8800700104 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This essay considers studies of speech and language that base claims in exemplars by discussing: (1) some classic exemplars used by Austin, Wittgenstein, and others; and (2) exemplars' specifications of message and scene. One exemplist school, conversation analysis, receives emphasis in this treatment, and is contrasted with experimentation in terms of sampling, design, and techniques for analysis. Recommendations for exemplist research include: (1) giving priority to naturally occurring tape-recorded exemplars; (2) employing experimental techniques to extend exemplist research; (3) maintaining openness to innovation and serendipity.
Notes
