Difference between revisions of "Lynch1988b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Michael Lynch; |Title=Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual pract...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Michael Lynch;  
+
|Author(s)=Michael Lynch;
|Title=Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences
+
|Title=Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Sacrifice; Objects; Neuroscience
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Sacrifice; Objects; Neuroscience
 
|Key=Lynch1988b
 
|Key=Lynch1988b
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Journal=Social Studies of Science
 
|Journal=Social Studies of Science
 
|Volume=18
 
|Volume=18
|Pages=265-289
+
|Number=2
 +
|Pages=265–289
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/030631288018002004
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/030631288018002004
|Abstract=The term `sacrifice' is used by experimental biologists to describe methods for killing laboratory specimens. In Western societies, `sacrifice' usually connotes a process of `making sacred', a process Durkheim and his followers interpreted as a ritual transformation between `profane' and `sacred' realms. This paper examines whether `sacrifice' in the experimental context bears any relation to such traditional usage, or whether, as animal rights advocates argue, the term is no more than a euphemism for brutal and unnecessary slaughter. Drawing on ethnographic observations of laboratory practice, the paper argues that `sacrifice' means much more than simply killing a specimen, and that the violence done to the animal victim is part of a systematic `consecration' of its body to transform it into a bearer of transcendental significances. While scientists do not treat their practices as ceremonial rituals endowed with religious meaning, laboratory `sacrifice' is a part of a sequence of procedures through which the naturalistic animal body is transformed into an abstracted analytic object with generalized significance for members of the research community.
+
|DOI=10.1177/030631288018002004
 +
|Abstract=The term 'sacrifice' is used by experimental biologists to describe methods for killing laboratory specimens. In Western societies, 'sacrifice' usually connotes a process of `making sacred', a process Durkheim and his followers interpreted as a ritual transformation between `profane' and `sacred' realms. This paper examines whether 'sacrifice' in the experimental context bears any relation to such traditional usage, or whether, as animal rights advocates argue, the term is no more than a euphemism for brutal and unnecessary slaughter. Drawing on ethnographic observations of laboratory practice, the paper argues that 'sacrifice' means much more than simply killing a specimen, and that the violence done to the animal victim is part of a systematic 'consecration' of its body to transform it into a bearer of transcendental significances. While scientists do not treat their practices as ceremonial rituals endowed with religious meaning, laboratory 'sacrifice' is a part of a sequence of procedures through which the naturalistic animal body is transformed into an abstracted analytic object with generalized significance for members of the research community.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:56, 21 October 2019

Lynch1988b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Lynch1988b
Author(s) Michael Lynch
Title Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Sacrifice, Objects, Neuroscience
Publisher
Year 1988
Language
City
Month
Journal Social Studies of Science
Volume 18
Number 2
Pages 265–289
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/030631288018002004
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The term 'sacrifice' is used by experimental biologists to describe methods for killing laboratory specimens. In Western societies, 'sacrifice' usually connotes a process of `making sacred', a process Durkheim and his followers interpreted as a ritual transformation between `profane' and `sacred' realms. This paper examines whether 'sacrifice' in the experimental context bears any relation to such traditional usage, or whether, as animal rights advocates argue, the term is no more than a euphemism for brutal and unnecessary slaughter. Drawing on ethnographic observations of laboratory practice, the paper argues that 'sacrifice' means much more than simply killing a specimen, and that the violence done to the animal victim is part of a systematic 'consecration' of its body to transform it into a bearer of transcendental significances. While scientists do not treat their practices as ceremonial rituals endowed with religious meaning, laboratory 'sacrifice' is a part of a sequence of procedures through which the naturalistic animal body is transformed into an abstracted analytic object with generalized significance for members of the research community.

Notes